Johnson v. Cate et al

Filing 76

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Reference To Pro Se Prisoner Settlement Program (ECF No. 71 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/27/2014. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 GARRISON S. JOHNSON, Case No. 1:10-cv-02348-LJO-MJS (PC) 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 15 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REFERENCE TO PRO SE PRISONER SETTLEMENT PROGRAM (ECF No. 71) CATE, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant 20 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on an equal protection claim against Defendant 21 Doran, Inmate Assignment Lieutenant at Kern Valley State Prison (“KVSP”). 22 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s request that the case be referred to the pro se prisoner 23 settlement program. However, the Court will not refer a case to formal settlement talks 24 unless all parties agree such negotiations might be productive. Local Rule 271(b)(4). After 25 inquiry to the Attorney General’s office, this Court’s settlement program administrator 26 advises that the defense is not presently interested in pursuing a settlement conference in 27 this matter. 28 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion that the case be 1 1 referred to the pro se prisoner settlement program (ECF No. 71) is DENIED without 2 prejudice. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 27, 2014 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?