Marsh v. Brown et al

Filing 23

ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 17 , ORDER Denying Motion to Compel 16 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/9/11. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LAWRENCE MARSH,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.
JERRY BROWN, et al.,

15
16
17

Defendants.
_____________________________/

1:10-cv-02353-LJO-GSA-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 17.)
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
COMPEL RETURN OF WORD
PROCESSOR
(Doc. 16.)

Lawrence Marsh (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action

18

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant

19

to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On October 27, 2011, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

21

Plaintiff's motion to compel the return of his word processor, filed on October 25, 2011, be denied.

22

(Doc. 17.) Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and

23

recommendations within thirty days. To date, Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise

24

responded to the findings and recommendations.

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this

26

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

27

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

28

1

1

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

2

1.

3

The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on October 27,
2011, are ADOPTED in full; and

4

2.

5

Plaintiff's motion to compel the return of his word processor, filed on October 25,
2011, is DENIED.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated:
b9ed48

December 9, 2011

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2