Franco et al v. Ruiz Food Products, Inc.
Filing
42
ORDER REQUIRING Defendant to file proof of service of notice of the proposed class settlement on the Attorney General for the United States and the appropriate state official pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1715. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/10/2012. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
PATRICIA FRANCO, et al.,
9
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-02354-AWI-SKO
Plaintiffs,
10
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO
FILE PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE
OF THE PROPOSED CLASS
SETTLEMENT ON THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL FOR THE UNITED STATES
AND THE APPROPRIATE STATE
OFFICIAL PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. ยง 1715
v.
11
RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.,
12
13
Defendant.
/
14
15
16
The Court was recently informally informed that, on August 7, 2012, Defendant Ruiz Food
17
Products, Inc. ("Defendant") served notice of the proposed class settlement in this action upon the
18
United States Attorney General and the appropriate state counterpart as required under 28 Section
19
1715(d).
20
Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to file Proof(s) of Service with the Court establishing
21
such service. Further, as Section 1715(d) requires a 90-day notice period beginning from when the
22
Attorney General and state officer have been notified, the Court will hold in abeyance the issuance
23
of its Findings and Recommendations for Final Approval of Class Settlement until after the notice
24
period has expired.
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28
Dated:
ie14hj
August 10, 2012
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?