Dixon v. Allison et al

Filing 54

ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Close Case Pursuant to Parties' Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/22/18. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICK DIXON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, 15 Defendant. 16 Case No.: 1:10:-cv-02365-DAD-SAB (PC) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE PURSUANT TO PARTIES’ STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL [ECF No. 53] Plaintiff Rick Dixon is appearing pro se and in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1983. 19 On March 21, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant 20 to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as the case has been resolved in its 21 entirety. (ECF No. 53.) 22 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without 23 a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. A 24 voluntary stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) automatically terminates the 25 action without operation of a court order. Black Rock City, LLC v. Pershing Cty. Bd. of Comm’rs, 26 637 F. App’x 488 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 27 1077 (9th Cir. 1999)). Here, Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant Allison have signed and dated a 28 stipulation to dismiss this action, and filed it with the Court. 1 1 In light of parties’ stipulation for voluntary dismissal, this action is terminated by operation of 2 law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party is to bear its own 3 litigation costs and attorney’s fees. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 7 March 22, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?