Brady K. Armstrong v. Yates et al
Filing
59
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Court Intervention for Lack of Jurisdiction 58 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/21/13. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
BRADY K. ARMSTRONG,
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
v.
S. DISHMAN,
12
Case No. 1:10-cv-02380-LJO-DLB PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR COURT INTERVENTION
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
(ECF No. 58)
Defendant.
13
14
15
Plaintiff Brady K. Armstrong (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. On August 21, 2013, the Court granted Plaintiff’s
16
Motion for Default Judgment and entered judgment against Defendant S. Dishman in the amount of
17
$2,500.00.
18
intervention to provide Plaintiff with the court ordered settlement. (ECF No. 58.)
19
(ECF Nos. 55 & 56.)
On November 4, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for court
“Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power authorized by
20
Constitution and statute.” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377, 114 S. Ct.
21
22
1673, 1675, 128 L. Ed. 2d 391 (1994). It is to be presumed that a cause lies outside this limited
23
jurisdiction. Id. Here, the Court has entered judgment and no longer retains jurisdiction in this
24
matter. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for court intervention is
25
DENIED for lack of jurisdiction.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1
1
2
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
November 21, 2013
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3
4
DEAC_Signature-END:
3b142a
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?