Hames et al v. Wyeth LLC et al
Filing
64
ORDER Granting Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41, signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/13/12. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Philip C. Bourdette SBN 47492
Miriam Bourdette SBN 151980
BOURDETTE & PARTNERS
2924 West Main Street
Visalia, CA 93291
(559) 625-8425
Fax (559) 625-8491
pcbb@bourdettelaw.com
mrbb@bourdettelaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Simona A. Farrise SBN 171708
Leigh Kirmsse SBN 160967
Farrise Firm PC
225 South Olive St., Ste 102
Los Angeles, CA 90012
310-424-3355
FAX 510-588-4536
sfarrise@farriselaw.com
LKirmsse@farriselaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Sharon J. Arkin SBN #154858
The Arkin Law Firm
333 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
(541) 469-2892
FAX: 866) 571-5676
sarkin@arkinlawfirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Pamela Yates SBN 137740
Wendy S. Dowse SBN 261224
Julie A. Belezzuoli SBN 267302
KAYE SCHOLER LLP
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
(310) 788-1000
FAX (310) 788-1200
pyates@kayescholer.com
wdowse@kayescholer.com
julie.belezzuoli@kayscholer.com
Attorneys for Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
1
2
3
4
NANCY WADDELL,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
5
6
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
Defendants.
Case No.: 1:04-cv-06343-JRG-DLB
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO
RULE 41
10
11
)
) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02404-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
KAY UHALT and STEPHEN UHALT,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
DOROTHY SETSER and HOWARD SETSER,
20
21
22
23
)
) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02405-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
Defendants
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
3
4
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02394-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CAROL HILL and LEONARD HILL
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WYETH LLC. et al
Defendants.
5
6
7
8
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02395-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
MARIANNE PHILLIPS and WILLIAM
PHILLIPS,
9
Plaintiffs,
10
11
12
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
13
14
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
19
Defendants.
20
21
BETTY CRAVEN and GEORGE CRAVEN,
22
Plaintiffs,
23
24
25
26
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
Defendants.
27
28
3
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02384-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
GLORIETTE MCPHERSON,
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02382-JRG-DLB
1
SHIRLEY BOWLES and GERALD BOWLES,
)
) Case No.: 1:04-cv-06346-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02392-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2
Plaintiffs,
3
4
5
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
6
Defendants.
7
8
DONNA HAMES and MICHAEL HAMES
9
10
11
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
VICTORIA POOLE and DELBERT POOLE
16
17
18
)
) Case No.: 1:10-cv-02397-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WYETH LLC, et al.
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-00287-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
LOIS ZANYK
Plaintiff,
vs.
PFIZER INC., et al.
26
27
28
Defendants.
4
1
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-00289-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CARLEEN WEST
2
Plaintiff,
3
4
5
vs.
PFIZER INC., et al.
6
Defendants.
7
8
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-00288-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PAMELA TURNER
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
vs.
PFIZER INC., et al.
13
Defendants.
14
15
)
Case No.: 1:10-cv-00282-JRG-DLB
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
LUCILLE MACIAS
16
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
vs.
PFIZER INC., et al.
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
The Court having considered the Parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice
Pursuant to Rule 41 and the files and pleadings herein;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
25
26
27
28
5
1
1.
The above-captioned actions are dismissed with prejudice as to all Defendants,
2
with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. All other relief not expressly granted
3
herein is denied.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED
6
7
Dated: November 13, 2012
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?