Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/8/11. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL JACKSON, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) 1:10cv2418 DLB ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action for judicial review of the denial of Social Security 18 benefits, filed on December 30, 2010. Also on December 30, 2010, the Court issued a Scheduling 19 Order. The Scheduling Order states that within 120 days after service, Defendant shall file and serve 20 a copy of the administrative record, which shall be deemed an answer to the complaint. The Order 21 also provides that within 30 days after service of the administrative record, Plaintiff shall serve on 22 Defendant a letter brief outlining why remand is warranted which Defendant shall respond to within 23 35 days. Thereafter, if Defendant does not stipulate to remand, within 30 days of Defendant’s 24 response, Plaintiff must file and serve an opening brief. 25 26 27 28 1 1 2 3 On May 11, 2011, Defendant lodged the administrative record. Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Plaintiff was required to file his brief on or before August 17, 2011. However, on August 8, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiff’s substitution of attorney and 4 Plaintiff was substituted in pro se. As it was counsel’s responsibility to inform Plaintiff of the 5 upcoming dates upon withdrawal, the Court did not extend deadlines. 6 Plaintiff has not filed his opening brief and has not otherwise communicated with the Court. 7 Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why the action should 8 not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court’s orders. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a 9 written response to this Order to Show Cause within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. If 10 Plaintiff desires more time to file his brief or wishes to dismiss this action, he should so state in 11 his response. 12 Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will result in dismissal of this action. 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9b0hie September 8, 2011 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?