National Labor Relations Board v. Crown Natural Foods et al

Filing 10

ORDER Show Cause Hearing RESET from 5/14/2010 to 6/11/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/29/2010. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 Petitioner, 11 v. 12 CROWN NATURAL FOODS, et al., 13 14 Respondents. 15 16 Applicant National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") filed the instant petition to enforce 17 an administrative subpoena on March 23, 2010. 18 The Court issued an Order to Show Cause on March 31, 2010. The order required that 19 Respondents file an answer by April 23, 2010, and set the hearing for May 14, 2010. 20 Respondents have not filed an answer or otherwise appeared in this action. 21 On April 28, 2010, NLRB filed a motion to "reissue" the Order to Show Cause, 22 explaining that they inadvertently failed to serve the March 31, 2010, order on Respondents. 23 The Court construes NLRB's motion as a request to continue the dates in the March 31, 24 2010, Order to Show Cause and GRANTS the motion. The hearing for the March 31, 2010, 25 Order to Show Cause is CONTINUED to June 11, 2010. Respondents' answer to the application 26 is due on or before May 21, 2010. NLRB's reply, if any, is due on or before June 4, 2010. 27 28 1 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10mc0015 DLB ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE DATES IN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Document 9) ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE Date: June 11, 2010 Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 3b142a 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NLRB shall serve a copy of this order AND the March 31, 2010, Order to Show Cause, on Respondents pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 29, 2010 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?