George K.Colbert v. Carrasco et al

Filing 13

ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION And, Order Denying Motion For Preliminary Injunction (Doc. Nos. 9 , 10 ), signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/27/2012. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 GEORGE K. COLBERT, CASE NO. 1:11-cv-0010 AWI GSA (PC) 4 Plaintiff, 5 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION AND, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION v. 6 M. CARRASCO, et al., 7 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 9, 10) 8 / 9 10 Plaintiff George Colbert (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 11 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in 12 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 22, 2011, 13 Plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 9). The matter was referred to a 14 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 15 On July 16, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”) 16 that recommended denying Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. Through an extension, 17 Plaintiff had until September 25, 2012, to file objections. Plaintiff has not filed objections. 18 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court has reviewed this 19 case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the F&R to be supported by the 20 record and by proper analysis. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed July 16, 2012 (Doc. No. 10), is 23 ADOPTED in full; and 24 2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 9) is DENIED. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: 0m8i78 September 27, 2012 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?