George K.Colbert v. Carrasco et al

Filing 43

ORDER GRANTING 38 Motion Extension of Time to File a Motion for Summary Judgment NUNC PRO TUNC, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 01/29/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GEORGE K. COLBERT,

12
13
14

1:11-cv-00010-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC
(Doc. 38.)

vs.
M. CARRASCO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19

George K. Colbert (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

20

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. This case now proceeds with

21

the First Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff on May 24, 2013, against defendants Carrasco,

22

Heil, Noyce, and Steadman (“Defendants”) for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment.

23

(Doc. 17.)

24

On November 25, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to extend the deadline for filing a

25

motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies, from

26

December 2, 2014 to December 12, 2014. (Doc. 38.) In light of the fact that Defendants filed

27

their motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion on December 12, 2014, the court

28

finds good cause to grant Defendants an extension of time nunc pro tunc.

1

Accordingly, good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’

2

motion to extend time to file a motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion is

3

GRANTED nunc pro tunc.

4
5
6
7

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 29, 2015

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE