Delgado v. Murshed et al

Filing 25

STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/20/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Delgado 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL DELGADO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 16 AHMED S. MURSHED dba SNAP ROSE FOOD STORE; RAVINDER P. SETHI and AASHIMA P. SETHI, 17 Defendants. 18 ) No. 1:11-CV-00042-AWI-GSA ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Daniel Delgado (“Plaintiff”) 20 and Defendants Ahmed Murshed dba Snap Rose Food Store, Ravinder P. Sethi and Aashima P. 21 Sethi (“Defendants”), the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that 22 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be 23 dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 24 Date: December 20, 2011 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 25 26 /s/Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff Daniel Delgado 27 28 /// Delgado v. Murshed, et al. Stipulation for Dismissal Page 1 1 Date: December 20, 2011 FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP 2 /s/ James Fessenden James Fessenden, Attorneys for Defendants Ahmed S. Murshed dba Snap Rose Food Store, Ravinder P. Sethi and Aashima P. Sethi 3 4 5 6 7 ORDER 8 9 10 The parties having so stipulated, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action. This is action dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 11 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 20, 2011 16 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 17 0m8i788 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Delgado v. Murshed, et al. Stipulation for Dismissal Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?