Delgado v. Murshed et al
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/20/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Daniel Delgado
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL DELGADO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
16
AHMED S. MURSHED dba SNAP ROSE
FOOD STORE; RAVINDER P. SETHI and
AASHIMA P. SETHI,
17
Defendants.
18
) No. 1:11-CV-00042-AWI-GSA
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Daniel Delgado (“Plaintiff”)
20
and Defendants Ahmed Murshed dba Snap Rose Food Store, Ravinder P. Sethi and Aashima P.
21
Sethi (“Defendants”), the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that
22
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be
23
dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
24
Date: December 20, 2011
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
25
26
/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Daniel Delgado
27
28
///
Delgado v. Murshed, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal
Page 1
1
Date: December 20, 2011
FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP
2
/s/ James Fessenden
James Fessenden, Attorneys for
Defendants Ahmed S. Murshed dba
Snap Rose Food Store, Ravinder P. Sethi
and Aashima P. Sethi
3
4
5
6
7
ORDER
8
9
10
The parties having so stipulated, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this
action. This is action dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
11
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 20, 2011
16
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
17
0m8i788
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Delgado v. Murshed, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?