Ransom v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitations, et al.

Filing 128

ORDER for Status Update re 81 and 86 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 01/23/2016. (7- Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
BRYAN E. RANSOM,

12

Case No. 1: 11-cv-0068-AWI-MJS (PC)

Plaintiff,

13

ORDER FOR STATUS UPDATE
v.

14

(ECF NOS. 81, 86)

15

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,

16

SEVEN (7) DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

17
18
19

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

20 rights action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds against
21 Defendants Bondoc, Madina, Swingle, Neubarth, Corea and Dhah on Plaintiff’s Eighth
22 Amendment medical indifference claims.1 (ECF Nos. 21 & 26.)
23

Before the Court are two motions to compel filed by Defendants Swingle,

24 Neubarth, and Bondoc (ECF No. 81) and Madina (ECF No. 86). Both of these motions
25 object claim that Plaintiff has not responded at all to their discovery requests.
26

On October 23, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice indicating that he has responded to

27
1

Defendant Greaves was dismissed (ECF No. 67.), and Defendant Punt has defaulted (ECF Nos. 53 &

28 54.)

1 Defendants Swingle, Neubarth, and Bondoc’s discovery requests. (ECF No. 108.) The
2 record also suggests that Plaintiff responded to Defendant Madina’s discovery requests
3 in November 2015. (See ECF Nos. 109-110.)
4

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Swingle, Neubarth,

5 Bondoc, and Madina apprise the Court within seven (7) days of the status of their
6 respective motions to compel.
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 23, 2016

/s/

10

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2