Ransom v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitations, et al.
Filing
48
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk's Office to Resend 39 Order to Show Cause to Defendant Punt signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/18/2015. Defendant Punt at High Desert State Prison, c/o Litigation, P.O. Box 750, Susanville, CA 96130.(Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
BRYAN E. RANSOM,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
Case No. 1: 11-cv-00068-AWI-MJS (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE
TO RESEND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
TO DEFENDANT PUNT
(ECF No. 39)
Defendants.
18
19
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
20 rights action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983.
The action proceeds against
21 Defendants Greaves, Bondoc, Punt, Madina, Swingle, Neubarth, Corea and Dhah on
22 Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment medical indifference claims. (ECF Nos. 21 & 26.)
23
On February 10, 2015, Defendant Punt was ordered to show cause why default
24 should not be entered against her. (ECF No. 39.) The Clerk’s Office was directed to
25 serve a copy of the order on Defendant Punt at the address where service was
26 effectuated. The order was sent to 475-750 Rice Canyon Rd., Susanville, CA 96130
27 and returned as undeliverable. However, it appears from the docket that service was
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
effectuated at High Desert State Prison, c/o Litigation, P.O. Box 750, Susanville, CA
96130. (ECF No. 33.)
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
The Clerk’s Office serve a copy of the Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 39.) on
Defendant Punt at High Desert State Prison, c/o Litigation, P.O. Box 750, Susanville,
CA 96130.
7
8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated:
March 18, 2015
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?