Ransom v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitations, et al.

Filing 48

ORDER DIRECTING Clerk's Office to Resend 39 Order to Show Cause to Defendant Punt signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/18/2015. Defendant Punt at High Desert State Prison, c/o Litigation, P.O. Box 750, Susanville, CA 96130.(Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 BRYAN E. RANSOM, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Case No. 1: 11-cv-00068-AWI-MJS (PC) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO RESEND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TO DEFENDANT PUNT (ECF No. 39) Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 20 rights action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds against 21 Defendants Greaves, Bondoc, Punt, Madina, Swingle, Neubarth, Corea and Dhah on 22 Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment medical indifference claims. (ECF Nos. 21 & 26.) 23 On February 10, 2015, Defendant Punt was ordered to show cause why default 24 should not be entered against her. (ECF No. 39.) The Clerk’s Office was directed to 25 serve a copy of the order on Defendant Punt at the address where service was 26 effectuated. The order was sent to 475-750 Rice Canyon Rd., Susanville, CA 96130 27 and returned as undeliverable. However, it appears from the docket that service was 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 effectuated at High Desert State Prison, c/o Litigation, P.O. Box 750, Susanville, CA 96130. (ECF No. 33.) Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: The Clerk’s Office serve a copy of the Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 39.) on Defendant Punt at High Desert State Prison, c/o Litigation, P.O. Box 750, Susanville, CA 96130. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: March 18, 2015 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?