Jackson v. Yates et al

Filing 220

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 218 Motion for Copy of Hearing Transcript at Government's Expense, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/21/15. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

CURTIS RENEE JACKSON,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.
J. MENDEZ, et al.,
Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:11-cv-00080-BAM (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
COPY OF HEARING TRANSCRIPT AT
GOVERNMENT’S EXPENSE
(ECF No. 218)

17
18

Plaintiff Curtis Renee Jackson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

19

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties consented to magistrate

20

judge jurisdiction in this case. (ECF No. 117). Following a jury trial in which a verdict for the defense

21

was reached, judgment was entered on December 7, 2015. (ECF No. 214). Plaintiff appealed.

22
23

On December 15, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking a transcript of the November 13, 2015
motion in limine telephonic hearing in this case. (ECF No. 218).

24

A litigant who has been granted in forma pauperis status may move to have transcripts

25

produced at government expense. Two statutes must be considered whenever the district court receives

26

a request to prepare transcripts at the government’s expense. First, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c) defines the

27

limited circumstances under which the Court can direct payment the government to pay for transcripts

28

for a litigant proceeding in forma pauperis:
1

1
(c) Upon the filing of an affidavit in accordance with subsections (a) and
(b) and the prepayment of any partial filing fee as may be required under
subsection (b), the court may direct payment by the United States of the
expenses of (1) printing the record on appeal in any civil or criminal case,
if such printing is required by the appellate court; (2) preparing a transcript
of proceedings before a United States magistrate judge in any civil or
criminal case, if such transcript is required by the district court, in the case
of proceedings conducted under section 636(b) of this title or under
section 3401(b) of title 18, United States Code; and (3) printing the record
on appeal if such printing is required by the appellate court, in the case of
proceedings conducted pursuant to section 636(c) of this title. Such
expenses shall be paid when authorized by the Director of the
Administrative Office of the United States Courts.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

28 U.S.C. § 1915(c). Second, 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) allows the Court to order the government to pay for

12

transcripts only if “the trial judge or a circuit judge certifies that the suit or appeal is not frivolous and

13

that the transcript is needed to decide the issue presented by the suit or appeal.” A request for a

14

transcript at government expense should not be granted unless “the appeal presents a substantial

15

issue.” Henderson v. United States, 734 F.2d 483, 484 (9th Cir. 1984).

16

Plaintiff’s notice of appeal in this case, (ECF No. 215), is devoid of any grounds for the appeal

17

and therefore, the Court cannot find that the appeal presents a substantial issue. Accordingly, IT IS

18

HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for the hearing transcript of the proceedings in this

19

matter on November 13, 2015 at the government expense, (ECF No. 218), is DENIED. Any further

20

relief on this issue must be sought from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

21
22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

December 21, 2015

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
2