Jackson v. Yates et al
Filing
93
ORDER ADOPTING 83 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Plaintiff's 58 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 09/24/2013. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CURTIS RENEE JACKSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
Y. A. YATES, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:11-cv-00080-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
(ECF Nos. 58, 83)
17
Plaintiff Curtis Renee Jackson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on January
19
18, 2011.
20
On August 12, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that
21
Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order be denied. The Findings and Recommendations
22
were served on the parties and contained notice than any objections were to be filed within thirty days.
23
More than thirty days have passed and no objections have been filed.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de
25
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and
26
recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
27
///
28
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations issued on August 12, 2013, are adopted in full; and
3
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED.
4
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
September 24, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
b9ed48bb
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?