Jackson v. Yates et al

Filing 93

ORDER ADOPTING 83 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Plaintiff's 58 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 09/24/2013. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURTIS RENEE JACKSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. Y. A. YATES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:11-cv-00080-LJO-BAM (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF Nos. 58, 83) 17 Plaintiff Curtis Renee Jackson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on January 19 18, 2011. 20 On August 12, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that 21 Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order be denied. The Findings and Recommendations 22 were served on the parties and contained notice than any objections were to be filed within thirty days. 23 More than thirty days have passed and no objections have been filed. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de 25 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and 26 recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 27 /// 28 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations issued on August 12, 2013, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED. 4 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill September 24, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: b9ed48bb 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?