Bishop v. Harrington et al
Filing
26
ORDER DENYING 24 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 6/18/2013. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT BISHOP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Plaintiff,
v.
KELLY HARRINGTON, et al.,
Case No. 1:11-cv-00094-SAB (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
APPOINT COUNSEL
(ECF No. 24)
Defendants.
Plaintiff Robert Bishop (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis, filed this civil rights action on January 10, 2011, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June
14, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to appoint counsel. (ECF No. 24.)
Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to the appointment of counsel in this action.
Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009); Storseth v. Spellman, 654 F.2d 1349, 1353
(9th Cir. 1981). The Court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(1), but it will do so only if exceptional circumstances exist. Palmer, 560 F.3d at 970;
Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986). In making this determination, the
Court must evaluate the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of Plaintiff to articulate
his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer 560 F.3d at 970
(citation and quotation marks omitted); Wilborn, 789 F.2d at 1331. Neither consideration is
dispositive and they must be viewed together. Palmer 560 F.3d at 970 (citation and quotation
28
1
1
marks omitted); Wilborn 789 F.2d at 1331.
2
In the present case, the Court does not find the required exceptional circumstances exist at
3
this time. Even if it is assumed that Plaintiff is not well versed in the law and that he has made
4
serious allegations which, if proved, would entitle him to relief, his case is not exceptional. The
5
Court is faced with similar cases almost daily. Accordingly,
6
7
Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel is HEREBY DENIED, without
prejudice.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
Dated:
11
June 18, 2013
_
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?