Bakhtiari v. Yates et al

Filing 43

ORDER to Defendants to SHOW CAUSE why Sanctions should not be imposed for Failure to Comply with the Court's Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 03/05/2012. (5-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 MORTEZA BAKHTIARI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Y. A. GONZALES, ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________ ) Case No.: 1:11!CV!00102!AWI !JLT (PC) ORDER TO DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER 15 16 On February 17, 2012, the Court conducted a telephonic status conference. (Doc. 41) at the 17 conference, the Court learned that Defendants' counsel had discovered a conflict and was no longer 18 able to represent the Defendants. However, the Court was assured that replacement counsel had 19 been identified and would file an appearance in the matter no later than March 2, 2012. Id. Because 20 Plaintiff's counsel reported that the delay caused by obtaining replacement counsel had impacted his 21 ability to conduct discovery, the Court amended the scheduling order. (Doc. 42) 22 As of the signing of this order, replacement counsel has not appeared in the action. 23 Therefore, within 5 days of service of this order, Defendants are ORDERED to show cause why 24 sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Court's order. Alternatively, 25 within this same time frame, their replacement counsel SHALL file an appearance in this matter. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: March 5, 2012 9j7khi 28 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?