Hughes v. Bruner
Filing
28
ORDER Adopting 27 Findings and Recommendations, Recommending Denying Plaintiff's 22 Motion for a Court Order, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/26/13. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
BERNARD C. HUGHES,
7
8
9
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00110-AWI-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A
COURT ORDER
v.
ROBERT BRUNER,
(ECF Nos. 22 & 27)
10
Defendant.
/
11
12
Plaintiff Bernard C. Hughes, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
13
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 21, 2011. The matter was referred
14
to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
15
On December 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for an order to return legal documents. (ECF
16
No. 22.) On February 22, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a findings and recommendations
17
recommending denying Plaintiff’s motion. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff did not file any objections to the
18
findings and recommendations.
19
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case.
20
Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be
21
supported by the record and by proper analysis.
22
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Court adopts the findings and
23
recommendations filed on February 22, 2013, in full. Plaintiff’s motion for a court order to return
24
legal documents is DENIED.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated:
0m8i78
March 26, 2013
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?