Sconiers v. Judicial Council of CA, et al.

Filing 59

ORDER striking 56 Motion notice of amended docket statement signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/31/2011. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JANETTA SCONIERS, 10 11 12 CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00113-LJO-SMS Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION NOTICE OF AMENDED DOCKET STATEMENT v. FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 (Doc. 56) / 15 On January 21, 2011, Plaintiff Janetta Sconiers filed a 569-page complaint purporting to 16 name as defendants numerous judicial, law enforcement, and other government officials. Since 17 filing her complaint, Plaintiff has plagued this Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals with 18 numerous malicious and frivolous findings, the most recent of which challenge this Court’s 19 inherent power to control its docket and the disposition of its cases with economy of time and 20 effort for both the Court and the parties. Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 21 (1936); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 915 (1992). 22 On October 31, 2011, Plaintiff again filed a frivolous and malicious motion, creatively 23 entitled “Motion Notice of Amended Docketing Statement,” which again challenges the Court’s 24 orders attempting to control Plaintiff’s seemingly endless flood of frivolous and malicious 25 motions. The Court may infer malice or a lack of good faith from documents containing untrue 26 material allegations of fact or false statements made with the intent to harass or deceive the court 27 or opposing parties. See Horsey v. Asher, 741 F.2d 209, 212 (8th Cir. 1984). The Court has the 28 1 1 inherent power to dismiss actions abusing judicial process. Glick v. Gutbrod, 782 F.2d 754, 757 2 (7th Cir. 1986). 3 4 The Court HEREBY STRIKES Plaintiff’s Motion Notice of Filing of Amended Docketing Statement, filed October 31, 2011, as Document 56. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: b9ed48 October 31, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?