Sconiers v. Judicial Council of CA, et al.

Filing 89

ORDER to Attorney Ralston L. Courtney to SHOW CAUSE Why He Should Not Be Held in Contempt For Failure to Pay Sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 2/29/12: Hearing set for 4/11/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1 (SMS) before Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder.(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 JANETTA SCONIERS, CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00113-LJO-SMS 4 5 ORDER TO ATTORNEY RALSTON L. COURTNEY TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HE SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT FOR FAILURE TO PAY SANCTIONS Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 8 FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., Date: April 11, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom 1 9 Defendants. 10 / 11 On December 13, 2011, this Court sanctioned Attorney Ralston Courtney pursuant to 12 F.R.Civ.P. 11 for failing to conduct a reasonable and competent inquiry regarding (a) Plaintiff’s 13 motives for proceeding with the complaint; (2) the legal sufficiency of the asserted claims; and 14 (c) the factual sufficiency of the asserted claims (Doc. 71). The Court ordered Courtney to pay a 15 penalty of $5000.00 to the Court’s Nonappropriated Fund no later than January 14, 2012 16 (Doc.71). Courtney has neither appealed the Court’s order not paid the penalty. 17 This Court HEREBY ORDERS that Attorney Ralston L. Courtney appear at a hearing set 18 for 10:00 a.m., April 11, 2012, before the Honorable Sandra M. Snyder, United States Magistrate 19 Judge, in Courtroom 1of the Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, 20 Fresno, California, prepared to show cause why he should not be held in civil contempt for 21 failure to pay the court-ordered sanction. Courtney is advised that failure to appear at the time 22 and place designated in this Order may result in his being adjudged in contempt. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: icido3 February 29, 2012 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?