Dowling et al v. Emadco Disposal Service, Inc. et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION And ORDER To File Settlement Agreement Under Seal, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/17/2011. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 BREN K. THOMAS, Bar No. 156226 MATTHEW E. FARMER, Bar No. 190484 LITTLER MENDELSON A Professional Corporation 5200 North Palm Avenue, Suite 302 Fresno, California 93704.2225 Telephone: 559.244.7500 Facsimile: 559.244.7525 bkthomas@littler.com mfarmer@littler.com 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant EMADCO DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 ROBERT DOWLING, an individual, and MICHAEL SMITH, an individual, individually, and acting on behalf of other aggrieved employees, and for the interests of the general public, 16 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT UNDER SEAL Plaintiffs, 14 15 Case No. 1:11-CV-00139-LJO-SKO v. EMADCO DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC., a California Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant. 18 19 20 Plaintiffs Robert Dowling and Michael Smith ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Emadco 21 Disposal Service, Inc. ("Defendant") pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 5.2 and U.S. 22 Eastern District Local Rules, Rule 141, hereby jointly stipulate that the parties have entered into a 23 Confidential Settlement Agreement and request entry of this proposed order to allow filing of the 24 Confidential Settlement Agreement under seal. The parties jointly stipulate and agree the following 25 facts and matters support the filing of the Confidential Settlement Agreement under seal: 26 1. Plaintiffs initiated this lawsuit against Defendant alleging, inter alia, violations 27 of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). Additionally, on behalf of themselves and similarly 28 situated employees, Plaintiffs sought various penalties under the California Private Attorneys LITTLE R MEND ELSO N A PROF E S SION AL C ORP OR A TION 5200 N orth Palm Avenue Suite 302 Fresno, CA 93704.2225 559.244.7500 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to File Settlement Agreement Under Seal (No. 1:11-CV-00139-LJO-SKO) 1 General Act ("PAGA") in regards to alleged wage and hour violations by Defendant. Defendant 2 completely denied any liability and without admitting liability, resolved the claims asserted by 3 Plaintiffs in this lawsuit as memorialized in the Confidential Settlement Agreement. 4 2. Pursuant to the FLSA, the Confidential Settlement Agreement must be 5 approved by the Court. D.A. Schulte, Inc. v. Gangi, 328 U.S. 108 (1946); Brooklyn Savings Bank v. 6 O'Neil, 324 U.S. 697 (1945); Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-55 7 (11th Cir. 1982); Jarrard v. Southeastern Shipbuilding Corp., 163 F.2d 960, 961 (5th Cir. 1947). 8 9 3. Additionally, pursuant to the PAGA, the Confidential Settlement Agreement must be approved by the Court. Cal. Lab. Code, § 2699(l). 10 4. Assuring confidentiality in settlement was a key and material term of the 11 parties' Confidential Settlement Agreement. None of the parties would have agreed to this early 12 settlement in this case without agreed to protections of confidentiality. 13 5. Individuals have a protectable privacy interest in their financial affairs. Cobb 14 v. Superior Court, 99 Cal.App.3d 543, 550 (1979). Corporations, such as Defendant, even enjoy 15 privacy rights in regards to financial and employment information as were both at issue in this case. 16 Ameri-Medical Corp. v. WCAB, 42 Cal.App.4th 1260, 1286-1289 (1996). Such privacy interests 17 readily attach to confidential settlement agreements, like the one submitted to the Court in this case. 18 Hinshaw, Winkler, Draa, Marsh & Still v. Superior Court, 51 Cal.App.4th 233, 241 (1996). 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// LITTLE R MEND ELSO N A PROF E S SION AL C ORP OR A TION 5200 N orth Palm Avenue Suite 302 Fresno, CA 93704.2225 559.244.7500 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to File Settlement Agreement Under Seal (No. 1:11-CV-00139-LJO-SKO 2. 1 6. Given the authority above, the parties had no choice but to file the 2 Confidential Settlement Agreement with the Court for approval. The parties stipulate and agree that 3 despite that required filing, the confidentiality of the settlement must be maintained. 4 5 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED. Dated: May 16, 2011 MORTIMER & SCHWIN 6 /s/_____________________________________ Kevin Schwin Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Robert Dowling and Michael Smith 7 8 9 10 Dated: May 16, 2011 LITTLER MENDELSON 11 /s/_____________________________________ Matthew E. Farmer Attorneys for Defendant Emadco Disposal Service, Inc. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N A PROF E S SION AL C ORP OR A TION 5200 N orth Palm Avenue Suite 302 Fresno, CA 93704.2225 559.244.7500 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to File Settlement Agreement Under Seal (No. 1:11-CV-00139-LJO-SKO 3. 1 ORDER 2 3 The Court, having read and considered the above stipulation and agreement of the 4 parties, hereby finds good cause exists to order the Confidential Settlement Agreement sealed. The 5 Court hereby orders the Confidential Settlement Agreement shall be filed under seal with the Court. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill May 17, 2011 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 DEAC_Signature-END: 66h44d 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N A PROF E S SION AL C ORP OR A TION 5200 N orth Palm Avenue Suite 302 Fresno, CA 93704.2225 559.244.7500 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to File Settlement Agreement Under Seal (No. 1:11-CV-00139-LJO-SKO 4.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?