Dowling et al v. Emadco Disposal Service, Inc. et al
Filing
13
STIPULATION And ORDER To File Settlement Agreement Under Seal, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/17/2011. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
BREN K. THOMAS, Bar No. 156226
MATTHEW E. FARMER, Bar No. 190484
LITTLER MENDELSON
A Professional Corporation
5200 North Palm Avenue, Suite 302
Fresno, California 93704.2225
Telephone:
559.244.7500
Facsimile:
559.244.7525
bkthomas@littler.com
mfarmer@littler.com
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant
EMADCO DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
ROBERT DOWLING, an individual,
and MICHAEL SMITH, an
individual, individually, and acting
on behalf of other aggrieved
employees, and for the interests of
the general public,
16
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT UNDER
SEAL
Plaintiffs,
14
15
Case No. 1:11-CV-00139-LJO-SKO
v.
EMADCO DISPOSAL SERVICE,
INC., a California Corporation; and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendant.
18
19
20
Plaintiffs Robert Dowling and Michael Smith ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Emadco
21
Disposal Service, Inc. ("Defendant") pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 5.2 and U.S.
22
Eastern District Local Rules, Rule 141, hereby jointly stipulate that the parties have entered into a
23
Confidential Settlement Agreement and request entry of this proposed order to allow filing of the
24
Confidential Settlement Agreement under seal. The parties jointly stipulate and agree the following
25
facts and matters support the filing of the Confidential Settlement Agreement under seal:
26
1.
Plaintiffs initiated this lawsuit against Defendant alleging, inter alia, violations
27
of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). Additionally, on behalf of themselves and similarly
28
situated employees, Plaintiffs sought various penalties under the California Private Attorneys
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N
A PROF E S SION AL C ORP OR A TION
5200 N orth Palm Avenue
Suite 302
Fresno, CA 93704.2225
559.244.7500
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to File Settlement
Agreement Under Seal
(No. 1:11-CV-00139-LJO-SKO)
1
General Act ("PAGA") in regards to alleged wage and hour violations by Defendant. Defendant
2
completely denied any liability and without admitting liability, resolved the claims asserted by
3
Plaintiffs in this lawsuit as memorialized in the Confidential Settlement Agreement.
4
2.
Pursuant to the FLSA, the Confidential Settlement Agreement must be
5
approved by the Court. D.A. Schulte, Inc. v. Gangi, 328 U.S. 108 (1946); Brooklyn Savings Bank v.
6
O'Neil, 324 U.S. 697 (1945); Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-55
7
(11th Cir. 1982); Jarrard v. Southeastern Shipbuilding Corp., 163 F.2d 960, 961 (5th Cir. 1947).
8
9
3.
Additionally, pursuant to the PAGA, the Confidential Settlement Agreement
must be approved by the Court. Cal. Lab. Code, § 2699(l).
10
4.
Assuring confidentiality in settlement was a key and material term of the
11
parties' Confidential Settlement Agreement. None of the parties would have agreed to this early
12
settlement in this case without agreed to protections of confidentiality.
13
5.
Individuals have a protectable privacy interest in their financial affairs. Cobb
14
v. Superior Court, 99 Cal.App.3d 543, 550 (1979). Corporations, such as Defendant, even enjoy
15
privacy rights in regards to financial and employment information as were both at issue in this case.
16
Ameri-Medical Corp. v. WCAB, 42 Cal.App.4th 1260, 1286-1289 (1996). Such privacy interests
17
readily attach to confidential settlement agreements, like the one submitted to the Court in this case.
18
Hinshaw, Winkler, Draa, Marsh & Still v. Superior Court, 51 Cal.App.4th 233, 241 (1996).
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N
A PROF E S SION AL C ORP OR A TION
5200 N orth Palm Avenue
Suite 302
Fresno, CA 93704.2225
559.244.7500
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to File Settlement
Agreement Under Seal
(No. 1:11-CV-00139-LJO-SKO
2.
1
6.
Given the authority above, the parties had no choice but to file the
2
Confidential Settlement Agreement with the Court for approval. The parties stipulate and agree that
3
despite that required filing, the confidentiality of the settlement must be maintained.
4
5
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED.
Dated: May 16, 2011
MORTIMER & SCHWIN
6
/s/_____________________________________
Kevin Schwin
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
Robert Dowling and Michael Smith
7
8
9
10
Dated: May 16, 2011
LITTLER MENDELSON
11
/s/_____________________________________
Matthew E. Farmer
Attorneys for Defendant
Emadco Disposal Service, Inc.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N
A PROF E S SION AL C ORP OR A TION
5200 N orth Palm Avenue
Suite 302
Fresno, CA 93704.2225
559.244.7500
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to File Settlement
Agreement Under Seal
(No. 1:11-CV-00139-LJO-SKO
3.
1
ORDER
2
3
The Court, having read and considered the above stipulation and agreement of the
4
parties, hereby finds good cause exists to order the Confidential Settlement Agreement sealed. The
5
Court hereby orders the Confidential Settlement Agreement shall be filed under seal with the Court.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
May 17, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
DEAC_Signature-END:
66h44d
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N
A PROF E S SION AL C ORP OR A TION
5200 N orth Palm Avenue
Suite 302
Fresno, CA 93704.2225
559.244.7500
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to File Settlement
Agreement Under Seal
(No. 1:11-CV-00139-LJO-SKO
4.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?