Areyano et al v. Tacaza, Inc et al

Filing 37

ORDER Granting STIPULATION For Dismissal; ORDER, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/7/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRESNO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 MARCUS T. AREYANO, an individual; FRANK W. BARTLETT, an individual; GUADALUPE GONZALEZ, an individual; MARY PEARL RIVERA, an individual; BRIAN RIGGINS, an individual; JUDD ROGERS, an individual; DARREN CAMPBELL, an individual; VINCENT CLINE, an individual; and RICHARD WILDT, an individual, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiffs, vs. TACAZA, INC. dba FAMOUS DAVE’S, a California corporation; TACAZA II, INC. dba FAMOUS DAVE’S, a California corporation; ANAND D. GALA, an individual; JONATHAN LITT, an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants. ) Case No. 1:11CV00171 LJO(DLB) ) ) ORDER GRANTING ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 25 26 27 28 LA1 2465933v.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 1 ORDER 2 Upon full consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal pursuant to Federal 3 Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) submitted by Plaintiffs Marcus T. Areyano, Frank 4 W. Bartlett, Guadalupe Gonzalez, Mary Pearl Rivera, Brian Riggins, Judd Rogers, 5 Darren Campbell, Vincent Cline, and Richard Wildt and Defendants Tacaza, Inc. dba 6 Famous Dave’s, Tacaza II, Inc. dba Famous Dave’s, Anand D. Gala, and Jonathan 7 Litt, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby orders that Case No. 1:11CV00171 8 LJO(DLB) is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is 9 directed to close this case in its entirety. 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill June 7, 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: b9ed48bb 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?