Williams v. The State of California et al

Filing 25

ORDER Adopting 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Dismissing Certain Claims and Defendants, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/12/2011. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

DONALD B. WILLIAMS,

8

Plaintiff,

9

v.

10

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

11

1:11-cv-0182-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
(ECF No. 20)

Defendants.

12
13

_______________________________/

14
15

Plaintiff Donald B. Williams (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

16

pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United

17

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

18

On August 29, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation,

19

recommending dismissal of certain of Plaintiff’s claims and defendants. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff

20

has failed to file objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

21

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this

22

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

23

Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

24

analysis.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
///

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendation, filed August 29, 2011, is adopted in full;

3

2.

Plaintiff’s claims against the California Department of Corrections are dismissed

4

without prejudice;

5

3.

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Allison are dismissed without prejudiced

6

4.

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Rodriguez, Beltran, Stolh, Lofkin, and

7

Childress are dismissed without prejudice;

8

5.

9

Plaintiff’s claims against Correction Management Corp. Inc. are dismissed without
prejudice;

10

6.

11

Plaintiff’s medical care claim against Defendants Enenmoh and Oneyeje related to
the October 12, 2010 incident is dismissed without prejudice;

12

7.

13

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Betancourt are dismissed without prejudice;
and

14

8.

Defendants California Department of Corrections, Allison, Rodriguez, Beltran,

15

Stohl, Lofkin, Childress, Correction Management Corp. Inc., and Betancourt are

16

dismissed without prejudice.

17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19

Dated:
b9ed48

October 12, 2011

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-