Earp v. County of Tulare et al
Filing
18
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/2/2011. (Yu, L)
1
Dennis R. Thelen, SBN 83999
Kevin E. Thelen, SBN 252665
LE BEAU • THELEN , LLP
5001 East Commercenter Drive, Suite 300
Post Office Box 12092
Bakersfield, California 93389-2092
(661) 325-8962; Fax (661) 325-1127
2
3
4
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant, COUNTY OF TULARE and
STEVEN HENRY (erroneously sued herein as "PHYSICIANS
ASSISTANT HENRY")
7
8
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DONNY Y. EARP,
12
CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-00196-MJS
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE
PARTIES; ORDER
COUNTY OF TULARE, PHYSICIANS
ASSISTANT HENRY, and DOES 1-25,
15
Defendants.
16
Case Filed:
Trial Date:
Magistrate:
February 3,2011
June 26, 2012
Michael J. Seng
17
The parties to the above referenced action, subject to the Court's approval, hereby stipulate to
18
19
the following:
WHEREAS the parties have recently stipulated and the Court has ordered a change in the expert
20
21
discovery disclosure dates in this case;
22
WHEREAS certain retained experts in this case have informed counsel who retained them that
23
significant difficulty, time, and expense will be encountered if the experts are required to generate a
24
report setting forth details regarding their prior deposition testimony and prior trial testimony as required
25
by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26, as such reports are not currently in existence at this time;
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES; ORDER
1
2
The parties HEREBY AGREE, subject to the Court's approval, to modify the expert witness
disclosure requirements under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26 as follows: :
3
1.
No expert witness designation by either plaintiff or defendants will be required to include
4
a list or report from each expert witness setting forth details regarding their prior deposition testimony
5
and prior trial testimony for the past four years as required by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26.
6
SO STIPULATED.
7
8
9
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: November 2, 2011
LeBEAU-THELEN, LLP
10
By:
11
12
/s/ KEVIN E. THELEN
KEVIN E. THELEN
Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF
TULARE and STEVEN HENRY
13
14
Dated: November 2, 2011
BOURDETTE AND PARTNERS
15
By:
16
17
/s/ PHILIP BOURDETTE
PHILIP BOURDETTE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DONNY Y. EARP
18
19
ORDER
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated:
ci4d6
November 2, 2011
Michael J. Seng
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES; ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?