Gill, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.
Filing
25
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE RE Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution, Show Cause Response due by 10/17/2011. signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/27/2011. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
Baldev Gill and Gurmeet Gill,
Plaintiffs,
10
11
12
15
16
17
18
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF
PROSECUTION
v.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.
13
14
1:11-cv-00218 OWW GSA
This case concerns mortgages securing real property in Fresno,
California.
A July 8, 2011 order granted Defendants Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation’s
(“Freddie Mac”) motions to dismiss with leave to amend.
Plaintiffs,
19
who are represented by counsel, were given until July 26, 2011 to file
20
an amended complaint.
21
amended complaint has been filed, nor have Plaintiffs otherwise
22
demonstrated intent to prosecute this matter.
23
24
As of the date of issuance of this order, no
In addition to Wells Fargo and Freddie Mac, the original
Complaint, removed from Fresno County Superior Court to the Eastern
25
26
27
28
District of California, named “CAL WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION”
as a Defendant.
Doc. 1-1.
It is unclear whether this party was ever
served; no appearance has been entered on its behalf.
1
1
Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause in writing on or before
2
October 17, 2011, why this case should not be dismissed in its
3
entirety for lack of prosecution.
4
Due to the pending retirement of the assigned district judge, the
5
6
7
8
parties will shortly receive notice of reassignment of this case.
That notice shall not alter the deadline for the filing of a response
to this order to show cause.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated:
September 27, 2011
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
14
emm0d64h
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?