Amaro v. Rios, Jr.
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/8/2011 adopting 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying Petitioner's request for injunctive relief. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
QUINN “R” AMARO,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
14
15
v.
HECTOR A. RIOS, JR., Warden,
Respondent.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:11-cv—00234-OWW-SKO-HC
ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 8)
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S
REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(DOC. 1)
17
Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in a
18
habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
The matter
19
has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
20
§ 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303.
21
On February 18, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings
22
and recommendations recommending the denial of Petitioner’s
23
request for injunctive relief in the form of an order appointing
24
counsel to represent him in proceedings before the United States
25
Parole Commission.
The findings and recommendations also
26
permitted the filing of objections within thirty days.
The
27
findings and recommendations were served on all parties on the
28
1
1
same date.
2
passed, no objections have been filed.
3
Although the time period for filing objections has
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636
4
(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case.
5
Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that
6
the report and recommendation is supported by the record and
7
proper analysis.
8
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
9
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on February 18,
10
2011, are ADOPTED in full; and
11
2. The request for injunctive relief in the form of an order
appointing counsel to represent Petitioner in parole proceedings
is DENIED.IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated:
July 8, 2011
emm0d6
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?