Hunter v. Harrington, et al.

Filing 10

ORDER Dismissing Plaintiff's Action with Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 9/2/11. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LEROY DEWITT HUNTER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00237-GBC (PC) ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S ACTION WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM v. K. HARRINGTON, et al., CLERK TO CLOSE CASE 14 15 16 Defendants. / ORDER 17 18 Plaintiff Leroy Dewitt Hunter (“Plaintiff”) is state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 19 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 10, 2011, 20 the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s original complaint, with leave to amend, for failure to state 21 a claim. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 22 (Id.) Plaintiff also was warned that failure to comply with the Court’s Order may result in 23 dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (Id.) 24 25 On July 20, 2011, the Court issued a Show Cause Order. (ECF No. 9.) The Show 26 Cause Order again warned Plaintiff that the case would be dismissed if Plaintiff failed to 27 respond to the Order and/or file an amended complaint by August 25, 2011. (Id.) To date, 1 the Court has not received a response to the Show Cause Order and Plaintiff has not filed 2 an amended complaint. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims 3 upon which relief may be granted. 4 Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court 5 6 HEREBY DISMISSES Plaintiff’s action, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state 7 any claims upon which relief may be granted under Section 1983. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Dated: 1j0bbc September 2, 2011 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?