Meadows v. Reeves, et al.
Filing
125
ORDER After Telephonic Conference Re: Discovery Dispute, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/18/17. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHANN MEADOWS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
Case No. 1:11-cv-00257 JLT (PC)
ORDER AFTER TELEPHONIC
CONFERENCE RE: DISCOVERY
DISPUTE
DR. REEVES,
15
Defendant.
16
17
At the request of counsel for the plaintiff, the Court held an informal, telephonic
18
conference regarding discovery disputes. After discussion with counsel, the Court ORDERS:
19
1.
Counsel SHALL work together to obtain the mental health records of the plaintiff.
20
The Court anticipates that Ms. Meadows will cooperate in this process. Ms. Huang SHALL
21
provide Mr. Wrosch with a signed release no later than 1/27/17 or notify him that Ms. Meadows
22
will not provide the release. In this event, counsel should immediately seek an informal
23
conference with the Court to resolve whe1ther the Court will issue an order requiring the
24
production of the records notwithstanding Ms. Meadows’ objection;
25
2.
The Court reminds counsel that if Ms. Meadows intends to rely only upon her
26
testimony related to her emotional damages and will not seek to introduce evidence related to any
27
mental health treatment, unless the mental health records reveal information that bears further on
28
1
1
1
2
the is topic, the Court will not be inclined to permit experts as the existence and extent of this
3
injury is within the capabilities of the jury to determine (See Fed. R. Evid. 701, 702);
4
5
3.
In the event the defendant seeks to procure an expert on the medical issues, the
Court will be inclined to appoint an impartial expert for the assistance of the trier of fact.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 18, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?