Barbosa v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.

Filing 26

SCHEDULING ORDER. 1) Any motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings must be filed no later than January 6, 2012; 2) The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) (1) on or before D ecember 6, 2011; 3) Discovery shall be completed by no later than December 7, 2012; 4) The motion for class certification shall be filed by no later than January 28, 2012; 5) Any opposition shall be filed by no later than February 25, 2013; 6) Any re ply briefs shall be filed by no later than March 11, 2013; 7) The motion for class certification shall be heard by no later than April 3, 2013, at 8:15 a..m. before the Honorable District Judge Lawrence ONeill in Courtroom 4. A status conference is set for July 17, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto in Courtroom 7. The parties may make telephonic appearances for the status conference. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/10/2011. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CHRISTINA BARBOSA, et al., 9 10 Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORP., 13 14 Defendant. ) 1:11-cv-00275 LJO SKO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER ) ) ) ) ) 15 16 17 On November 8, 2011, a scheduling conference was held. Dennis Wilson, Esq., Philip 18 Downey, Esq., and Kitty Szeto, Esq., made appearances on behalf of Plaintiffs. Jeremy Glenn, 19 Esq., and Joseph Tilson, Esq., appeared on behalf of Defendant. 20 The Court set the following deadlines: 21 1) no later than January 6, 2012.1 22 23 Any motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings must be filed /// 24 25 26 27 28 1 The parties are advised that filing motions and/or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings by 4/5/2011 does not reflect on the propriety of the amendment or imply good cause to modify the existing schedule, if necessary. All proposed amendments must (A) be supported by good cause pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) if the amendment requires any modification to the existing schedule, see Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992), and (B) establish, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), that such an amendment is not (1) prejudicial to the opposing party, (2) the product of undue delay, (3) proposed in bad faith, or (4) futile, see Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). 1 1 2) 2 The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on or before December 6, 2011. 3 3) Discovery shall be completed by no later than December 7, 2012. 4 4) The motion for class certification shall be filed by no later than January 28, 2012. 5 5) Any opposition shall be filed by no later than February 25, 2013. 6 6) Any reply briefs shall be filed by no later than March 11, 2013. 7 7) The motion for class certification shall be heard by no later than April 3, 2013, at 8 9 10 8:15 a..m. before the Honorable District Judge Lawrence O’Neill in Courtroom 4. A status conference is set for July 17, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto in Courtroom 7. The parties may make telephonic appearances for the status conference. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: ie14hj November 10, 2011 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?