Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

Stipulation and ORDER For DISMISSAL, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/21/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Marc V. Kalagian Attorney at Law: 149034 Law Offices of Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP 211 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 420 Long Beach, CA 90802 Tel.: (562)437-7006 Fax: (562)432-2935 E-mail: rohlfing.kalagian@rksslaw.com 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Chris L. Reynolds 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 8 9 10 11 CHRIS L. REYNOLDS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 16 17 ) Case No.: CV 11-0313-SKO ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ) DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 TO THE HONORABLE SHEILA K. OBERTO, MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Chris L. Reynolds 21 22 (“Plaintiff”) and Michael J. Astrue as the Commissioner of Social Security 23 24 25 26 /// /// /// -1- 1 (“Defendant”), that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its 2 own fees, costs, and expenses. The parties enter into this stipulation pursuant to 3 the terms of F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(1)(B), requiring no separate 4 order of the Court. 5 DATE: September 16, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 6 ROHLFING & KALAGIAN, LLP 7 /s/ Marc V. Kalagian BY: __________________ Marc V. Kalagian Attorney for plaintiff Chris L. Reynolds 8 9 10 11 DATE: September 16, 2011 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER. United States Attorney LEON W. WEIDMAN Chief, Civil Division 12 13 /s/ Kathryn R. Watson 14 Kathryn R. Watson Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization) 15 16 17 18 ORDER ___________ 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 Dated: September 21, 2011 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: ie14hje 24 25 26 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?