Forte v. County of Merced et al

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING 22 Plaintiff's Motion to Participate in Electronic Filing signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/23/2011. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE FORTE, CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00318-AWI-SKO 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO PARTICIPATE IN ELECTRONIC FILING 12 v. 13 (Doc. 22.) 14 COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., 15 Defendants. / 16 17 On June 21, 2011, Plaintiff Eugene Forte, proceeding in propria persona, filed a renewed 18 request to participate in electronic court filing. Based on District Judge Oliver W. Wanger’s granting 19 of a similar request in Case No. 1:11-cv-00718-OWW-SMS, and based upon this Court’s renewed 20 review of the filings in this case, including Plaintiff’s request, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request 21 to participate in electronic court filing. 22 The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail Plaintiff the “Petition by Pro Se Litigant for ECF 23 Registration and Consent to Electronic Service.” Plaintiff shall be responsible for filing all 24 documents in paper form until such time as Plaintiff signs and returns to the Clerk the above petition. 25 Once the petition is returned, Plaintiff is instructed to use the same login and password for Pacer that 26 was issued in Judge Wanger’s case. In addition, Plaintiff must provide to the Clerk, and must 27 /// 28 /// 1 maintain, a working email address. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: ie14hj June 23, 2011 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?