Forte v. County of Merced et al
Filing
232
ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO COURT FOR APPROVAL of Written Stipulation between Plaintiff and Defendant Anthony Parker extending Plaintiffs' time to respond or object to Defendant Anthony Parker's request for Production set one (1) set date June 26th, Production date July 31, 2014 to August 25, 2014, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/31/2014. (Kusamura, W)
3
Gene Forte
901 N. Carpenter Rd., Suite #32-122
Modesto, California, 95351
Telephone: (209) 622-0685
Email: geneforte@badgerflats.com
4
In Propria Persona /Plaintiff
1
2
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DIVISION
8
EUGENE E. FORTE,
9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
COUNTY OF MERCED, et al.
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
Case No. 1:11-cv-00318-AWI-BAM
JOINT MOTION TO COURT FOR
APPROVAL OF WRITTEN STIPULATION
BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT
ANTHONY PARKER EXTENDING
PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO RESPOND OR
OBJECT TO DEFENDANT ANTHONY
PARKER’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
SET ONE (1), SET DATED JUNE 26TH,
PRODUCTION DATE, JULY 31ST, 2014,
TO AUGUST 25TH, 2014 ; ORDER
[FRCP 29]
16
TRIAL: October 6, 2015
COMPLAINT FILED: February 24, 2011
17
18
WRITTEN STIPULATION
19
20
In pro per plaintiff, Eugene Forte, and defendant Anthony Parker’s counsel, Ms. Rayma
21
Church, on July 29th, 2014, have agreed by this written stipulation to EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’
22
TIME TO RESPOND OR OBJECT TO DEFENDANT ANTHONY PARKER’S REQUEST FOR
23
PRODUCTION SET ONE (1), SET DATED JUNE 26TH, PRODUCTION DATE, JULY 31ST,
24
2014, TO AUGUST 25TH, 2014, AND FILE THIS JOINT MOTION TO THE COURT FOR
25
APPROVAL.
26
DATED: July 29th, 2014
27
28
///
AGREED TO BY:
/s/ Eugene Forte
Eugene Forte
1
DATED: July 30, 2014
/s/ Rayma Church
Rayma Church
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Parties’ stipulation for an extension of time is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 31, 2014
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?