Forte v. County of Merced et al

Filing 232

ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO COURT FOR APPROVAL of Written Stipulation between Plaintiff and Defendant Anthony Parker extending Plaintiffs' time to respond or object to Defendant Anthony Parker's request for Production set one (1) set date June 26th, Production date July 31, 2014 to August 25, 2014, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/31/2014. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
3 Gene Forte 901 N. Carpenter Rd., Suite #32-122 Modesto, California, 95351 Telephone: (209) 622-0685 Email: geneforte@badgerflats.com 4 In Propria Persona /Plaintiff 1 2 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DIVISION 8 EUGENE E. FORTE, 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 COUNTY OF MERCED, et al. 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 Case No. 1:11-cv-00318-AWI-BAM JOINT MOTION TO COURT FOR APPROVAL OF WRITTEN STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT ANTHONY PARKER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO RESPOND OR OBJECT TO DEFENDANT ANTHONY PARKER’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION SET ONE (1), SET DATED JUNE 26TH, PRODUCTION DATE, JULY 31ST, 2014, TO AUGUST 25TH, 2014 ; ORDER [FRCP 29] 16 TRIAL: October 6, 2015 COMPLAINT FILED: February 24, 2011 17 18 WRITTEN STIPULATION 19 20 In pro per plaintiff, Eugene Forte, and defendant Anthony Parker’s counsel, Ms. Rayma 21 Church, on July 29th, 2014, have agreed by this written stipulation to EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS’ 22 TIME TO RESPOND OR OBJECT TO DEFENDANT ANTHONY PARKER’S REQUEST FOR 23 PRODUCTION SET ONE (1), SET DATED JUNE 26TH, PRODUCTION DATE, JULY 31ST, 24 2014, TO AUGUST 25TH, 2014, AND FILE THIS JOINT MOTION TO THE COURT FOR 25 APPROVAL. 26 DATED: July 29th, 2014 27 28 /// AGREED TO BY: /s/ Eugene Forte Eugene Forte 1 DATED: July 30, 2014 /s/ Rayma Church Rayma Church 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Parties’ stipulation for an extension of time is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 31, 2014 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?