Forte v. County of Merced et al

Filing 268

ORDER on Plaintiff's Request for Clarification (Docs. 266 and 267). signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/17/2014. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

EUGENE E. FORTE,
Plaintiff,

10
11
12

Case No. 1:11-cv-00318-AWI-BAM
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
FOR CLARIFICATION

v.
COUNTY OF MERCED, et al.,
Defendants.

13
14
15
16

/
On October 10, 2014, Plaintiff Eugene Forte filed a Request and an Amended Request for

17

“Rulings on Defendant Anthony Parkers’ Notice of Joinder” and “Plaintiff’s Objection to defendants

18

Anthony Parkers’ Notice of Joinder. . .” (Doc. 266, 267.) The Court construes these documents as a

19

request for clarification of the Court’s Order of September 23, 2014.

20

The Court denied the motions to dismiss filed by defendants, stayed discovery briefly, and

21

granted the motion to compel initial disclosure. No further ruling is necessary to resolve the issues

22

which were before the Court. The parties are advised that the Court carefully reviewed and considered

23

all of the briefs, including arguments, points and authorities, declarations, and/or exhibits. Any

24

omission of a reference to any specific argument or brief is not to be construed that the Court did not

25

consider the argument or brief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated:

/s/ Barbara

October 17, 2014

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2