Forte v. County of Merced et al

Filing 53

ORDER, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/3/11: Plaintiff's Motion to Continue Hearings on Defendants' Motiond to Dismiss is GRANTED; Motions CONTINUED from 8/22/2011 to 10/3/2011 at 1:30 pm in Courtroom 2. (Hellings, J)

3

Gene Forte
1312 Sierra Creek Ct
Patterson, California, 95363
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

4

In Propria Persona /Plaintiff

1
2

5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

EUGENE FORTE

Case No. 1:11-CV-00318-AWI-SKO

12

14

ORDER

Plaintiff,

13
vs.

Current Hearing Date: August 22, 2011
Time: 1:30pm
Dept: Courtroom 2, Judge Ishii
Complaint Filed: February 24, 2011

15
COUNTY OF MERCED, et al.
16
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue Hearings on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss was filed on
August 2, 2011.
The Court, having reviewed the moving papers on plaintiff’s motion, including the evidence

23

that plaintiff conducted a meet and confer with each counsel with no objection forthcoming, the

24

Court finds, adjudges and orders as follows:

25

1. That for good cause shown, Plaintiff Forte’s motion is GRANTED.

26

2. That the following motions currently scheduled for August 22, 2011 at 1:30pm are continued to

27

October 3, 2011 at 1:30pm in Courtroom 2 of the Eastern District Court of California in Fresno:

28
29
30

Forte v. County of Merced
Case No. 1:11-CV-00318-AWI-SKO

1

[Proposed] Order on Motion to Continue
Hearing on all Dfts’ Motions to Dismiss

1

a. Motion to Dismiss by County of Merced, DA Larry Morse, DDA Alan Turner, Merced

2

County Counsel James Fincher, Merced County Sheriff Mark Pazin, Deputy John Picinich,

3

Deputy Jaskowiac, Deputy Hill, Deputy Leuchner, and Supervisor Jerry O’Banion,

4

b. Defendants McClatchy Newspapers, Los Banos Enterprise, Gene Lieb and Corey pride’s

5

Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint,

6

c. Motion to Strike Pursuant to FRCP 12(f) by City of Los Banos,

7

d. City Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint by City of Los Banos,

8

Gary Brizzee, and Anthony Parker,

9

e. Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint by Defendant James Padron,

10

f. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and to Dismiss by Defendant McGhee, and

11

g. Defendant The Diocese of Fresno Education Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss

12

.

13

3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all Oppositions to the Motions will be due on September

14

19, 2011, and any Reply Briefs will be due on September 26, 2011 which conforms with the

15

new hearing date.

16
17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19

Dated:

20
21

August 3, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

0m8i788

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

Forte v. County of Merced
Case No. 1:11-CV-00318-AWI-SKO

2

[Proposed] Order on Motion to Continue
Hearing on all Dfts’ Motions to Dismiss