Owens v. Chasko
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER to continue the 16 MOTION to DISMISS Hearing currently set for 5/23/2011 to 5/31/2011 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/2/2011. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
James D. Burnside III
#75977
Jared C. Marshall
#272065
DOWLING, AARON & KEELER, INC.
8080 North Palm Avenue, Third Floor
P.O. Box 28902
Fresno, California 93729-8902
Tel: (559) 432-4500
Fax: (559) 432-4590
E-mail: jburnside@daklaw.com
jmarshall@daklaw.com
6
Attorneys for Defendant STEPHEN B. CHASKO
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL OWENS,
Case No. 1:11-CV-00335-AWI-GSA
Plaintiff,
12
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS AND ORDER THEREON
13
v.
14
STEPHEN B. CHASKO, an individual,
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Trial Date: None
15
Defendants.
16
STIPULATION
17
18
Due to the unavailability of Plaintiff’s counsel on the date first selected by the
19
moving party Defendant for the hearing on its motion to dismiss, the parties hereby agree the
20
hearing be continued from May 23, 2011 to May 31, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2.
21
Dated:
April 15, 2011
DOWLING, AARON & KEELER, INC.
22
By:
23
24
25
26
///
27
///
28
/s/ James D. Burnside III
James D. Burnside III
Jared C. Marshall
Attorneys for Defendant
STEPHEN B. CHASKO
///
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
AND ORDER THEREON
1
Dated:
April 19, 2011
WILLIAMS, JORDAN, BRODERSEN &
PRITCHETT, LLP
2
3
By:
4
/s/ Nick Pritchett
Nick Pritchett
Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL OWENS
5
6
ORDER
7
Good cause having been demonstrated,
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated:
May 2, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
13
9h0d30bb
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
AND ORDER THEREON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?