Owens v. Chasko

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER to continue the 16 MOTION to DISMISS Hearing currently set for 5/23/2011 to 5/31/2011 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/2/2011. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 James D. Burnside III #75977 Jared C. Marshall #272065 DOWLING, AARON & KEELER, INC. 8080 North Palm Avenue, Third Floor P.O. Box 28902 Fresno, California 93729-8902 Tel: (559) 432-4500 Fax: (559) 432-4590 E-mail: jburnside@daklaw.com jmarshall@daklaw.com 6 Attorneys for Defendant STEPHEN B. CHASKO 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL OWENS, Case No. 1:11-CV-00335-AWI-GSA Plaintiff, 12 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER THEREON 13 v. 14 STEPHEN B. CHASKO, an individual, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Trial Date: None 15 Defendants. 16 STIPULATION 17 18 Due to the unavailability of Plaintiff’s counsel on the date first selected by the 19 moving party Defendant for the hearing on its motion to dismiss, the parties hereby agree the 20 hearing be continued from May 23, 2011 to May 31, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2. 21 Dated: April 15, 2011 DOWLING, AARON & KEELER, INC. 22 By: 23 24 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /s/ James D. Burnside III James D. Burnside III Jared C. Marshall Attorneys for Defendant STEPHEN B. CHASKO /// STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER THEREON 1 Dated: April 19, 2011 WILLIAMS, JORDAN, BRODERSEN & PRITCHETT, LLP 2 3 By: 4 /s/ Nick Pritchett Nick Pritchett Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL OWENS 5 6 ORDER 7 Good cause having been demonstrated, 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: May 2, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 13 9h0d30bb 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?