Deborah Ostrander vs Macy's Department Stores, Inc.
Filing
9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DISPOSITIVE DOCUMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN FILED AND WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE ISSUED FOR DEFENDANT'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER. RESPONSE DUE BY 7/22/2011 signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/11/2011. (Yu, L)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DEBORAH OSTRANDER,
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00346-LJO-MJS
9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DISPOSITIVE DOCUMENTS HAVE NOT
BEEN FILED AND WHY SANCTIONS
v.
SHOULD NOT BE ISSUED FOR
DEFENDANT’S FAILURE TO COMPLY
MACY’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., WITH A COURT ORDER
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
RESPONSE DUE BY JULY 22, 2011
Defendant.
13
/ (ECF No. 8)
14
15
On June 2, 2011, Counsel for Defendant Macy’s Department Stores, Inc.
16
(“Defendant”) appeared telephonically before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. (Order,
17
ECF No. 8.) Counsel stated that he was appearing for both parties in this matter, because
18
the parties had settled this matter on June 1, 2011. (Id.) The Court ordered the parties to
19
file dispositive documents consistent with the settlement within thirty days. (Id.)
Over thirty days have passed and the Court has not received any dispositive
20
21
documents or any other response to the Court’s June 2, 2011 Order.
22
Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to show cause not later than July 22, 2011,
23
why sanctions should not be issued for failure to comply with the Court’s June 2, 2011
24
Order.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
ci4d6
July 11, 2011
Michael J. Seng
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
-1-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
