Madison et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 23

Stipulation for Dismissal; ORDER, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/27/2012. Laurie Tafoya, Karen Madison and Deborah Rusconi Terminated. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney JEFFREY J. LODGE Assistant United States Attorney United States Courthouse 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 6 Attorneys for Defendant United States of America 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 KAREN MADISON, DEBORAH RUSCONI, LAURIE TAFOYA, 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, v. 16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 17 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:11-cv-00375-AWI-MJS STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER 18 Pursuant to the terms of written Settlement Agreements as well as the provisions of Rule 19 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties, by and through their respective 20 counsel, hereby stipulate that this action be dismissed with prejudice. 21 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 22 Respectfully submitted, 23 THE LAW OFFICE OF RUSSELL D. COOK 24 25 Dated: April 27, 2012 By: 26 27 /s/ Russell D. Cook RUSSELL D. COOK Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Karen Madison, Deborah Rusconi, Laurie Tafoya 28 STIPU LATIO N FO R D ISM ISSAL; [PRO PO SED ] ORD ER 1 1 Dated: April 27, 2012 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 3 By: 4 5 /s/Jeffrey J. Lodge JEFFREY J. LODGE Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the United States of America 6 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL 8 The above stipulation is APPROVED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH 9 PREJUDICE. 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 April 27, 2012 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPU LATIO N FO R D ISM ISSAL; [PRO PO SED ] ORD ER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?