Delgado v. Sadik
Filing
38
ORDER FOR APPEARANCE and Examination of Judgment Debtor Ali Sadik, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/1/2012. (IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1. Defendant/judgment debtor Ali Sadik shall appear personally on Wednesday, 6/13/2012, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7 of the United States District Courthouse, located at 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721, to answer questions concerning Defendant/judgment debtor Ali Sadik's real and personal property; 2. Plaintiff/judgment credit or must serve this order upon Ali Sadik personally not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the examination and must file a certificate of such service with the Court; and 3. Any further requests for a continuance of the debtor examination by Plaintiff shall be presented to the Court through the filing of an ex parte motion which shall include a statement of the reasons that necessitate resetting the debtor examination as well as a proposed order in Word or WordPerfect format emailed to the Court at skoorders@caed.uscourts.gov.)(Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL DELGADO,
12
13
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00379-LJO-SKO
Plaintiff,
ORDER FOR APPEARANCE AND
EXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT
DEBTOR ALI SADIK
v.
14
(Doc. 36)
15
ALI SADIK, dba Bulter Mini Mart; JUAN
GALINDO, dba Bulter Mini Mart,
16
17
Defendants.
/
18
19
I.
INTRODUCTION
20
On January 17, 2012, the Court entered judgment against Defendant Ali Sadik. (Docs. 27,
21
28.) On March 29, 2012, Plaintiff filed a request for the issuance of an abstract of judgment, which
22
was issued by the Court on April 2, 2012. On March 29, 2012, Plaintiff filed an ex parte application
23
seeking a court order requiring the appearance and examination of judgment debtor Ali Sadik.
24
(Docs. 31.) Plaintiff's request for an order requiring the appearance and examination of judgment
25
debtor was granted, and the order was issued on April 6, 2012, requiring Defendant Ali Sadik to
26
personally appear before the Court on May 9, 2012. (Doc. 34.) On April 27, 2012, Plaintiff filed
27
a "notice to reschedule the hearing" that was a renewed application for an order that the debtor
28
examination take place on June 13, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7. (Doc. 36.)
1
II.
DISCUSSION
2
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a)(1), "[t]he procedure on execution – and
3
in proceedings supplementary to and in aid of judgment or execution – must accord with the
4
procedure of the state where the court is located, but a federal statute governs to the extent it
5
applies." In turn, California Code of Civil Procedure § 708.160 provides, in relevant part:
6
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the proper court for examination of
a person under this article is the court in which the money judgment is entered.
7
8
9
10
11
(b) A person sought to be examined may not be required to attend an examination
before a court located outside the county in which the person resides or has a place
of business unless the distance from the person's place of residence or place of
business to the place of examination is less than 150 miles.
(c) If a person sought to be examined does not reside or have a place of business in
the county where the judgment is entered, the superior court in the county where the
person resides or has a place of business is a proper court for examination of the
person.
12
Cal Civ. Proc. Code §§ 708.160(a)-(c).
13
The Court construes Plaintiff's April 27, 2012, filing as a renewed application for an order
14
for appearance and examination of a judgment debtor. The April 27, 2012, filing sets forth the
15
showing required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a)(2) and the applicable provisions of the
16
California Code of Civil Procedure § 708.160. As set forth below, Defendant Ali Sadik shall appear
17
personally before the Court on Wednesday, June 13, 2012.
18
III.
CONCLUSION
19
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
20
1.
Defendant/judgment debtor Ali Sadik shall appear personally on Wednesday, June
21
13, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7 of the United States District Courthouse,
22
located at 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721, to answer questions
23
concerning Defendant/judgment debtor Ali Sadik's real and personal property;
24
2.
Plaintiff/judgment creditor must serve this order upon Ali Sadik personally not less
25
than ten (10) days before the date set for the examination and must file a certificate
26
of such service with the Court; and
27
3.
Any further requests for a continuance of the debtor examination by Plaintiff shall
28
2
1
be presented to the Court through the filing of an ex parte motion which shall include
2
a statement of the reasons that necessitate resetting the debtor examination as well
3
as a proposed order in Word or WordPerfect format emailed to the Court at
4
skoorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
5
6
NOTICE TO JUDGMENT DEBTORS. IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR AT THE TIME
7
AND PLACE SPECIFIED IN THIS ORDER, YOU MAY BE SUBJECT TO ARREST AND
8
PUNISHMENT FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT AND THE COURT MAY MAKE AN
9
ORDER REQUIRING YOU TO PAY THE REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES
10
INCURRED BY THE JUDGMENT CREDITOR IN THIS PROCEEDING.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
Dated:
ie14hj
May 1, 2012
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?