Chambers v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING 18 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Full signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 05/03/2011. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ROBIN CHAMBERS,
11
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
PENSKE TRUCK LEASING
)
CORPORATION, a corporation; and DOES 1 )
through 60 inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )
1:11-cv-00381 LJO GSA
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL
(Document 18)
17
18
On March 9, 2011, Plaintiff Robin Chambers filed a Motion for Remand. (Docs. 10-12.)
19
On April 1, 2011, Defendant Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. filed its opposition to the motion.
20
(Doc. 14.) On April 6, 2011, Plaintiff filed her reply to the opposition. (Doc. 15.)
21
On April 15, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that
22
Plaintiff’s motion be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and
23
contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fifteen days of service of the
24
recommendations. (Doc. 18.)
25
To date, no objections have been filed.
26
27
28
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of Title 28 of the United States Code section 636
2
(b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the
3
entire file, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record
4
and proper analysis.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1.
7
The Findings and Recommendations issued April 15, 2011, are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
8
2.
9
Based on the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Robin Chambers’
Motion for Remand be DENIED.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated:
b9ed48
May 3, 2011
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?