Serrano v. Rawers et al
Filing
35
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/24/2014. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
JESSIE L. SERRANO,
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE No. 1:11-cv-00399-LJO-MJS
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
AN OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF
NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCOTT RAWERS, et al.,
(ECF No. 34)
17
Defendants.
18
19
Plaintiff Jessie L. Serrano is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
20
pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 16,
21
2014, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment.
22
twenty-one days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of
23
non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l).
24
1.
More than
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
(ECF No. 34.)
26
27
Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the
motion within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order; and
2.
Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will constitute a
28
1
1
waiver of opposition. Defendant is granted seven days to reply to any opposition filed by
2
Plaintiff.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 24, 2014
/s/
6
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?