Serrano v. Rawers et al

Filing 45

ORDER GRANTING 43 Motion Modify Discovery and Scheduling Order ; ORDERED that the deadline to taking depositions are VACATED, and will be reset, if necessary, following a ruling on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/13/15. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESSIE L. SERRANO, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00399-LJO-MJS (PC) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO MODIFY DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER v. (ECF No. 43) SCOTT RAWERS, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds against 19 Defendant Lucas on Plaintiff’s Eight Amendment failure to protect claim. (ECF No. 11.) 20 On June 16, 2014, the Court issued a discovery and scheduling order, setting 21 February 16, 2015 as the discovery deadline. (ECF No. 30.) On September 16, 2014, 22 Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground Plaintiff failed to exhaust 23 his administrative remedies. (ECF No. 34.) On January 7, 2015, Defendant filed a motion 24 to modify the discovery and scheduling order by vacating the deadline for taking 25 depositions and resetting it, if necessary, after the Court rules on the pending motion for 26 summary judgment. (ECF No. 43.) 27 Defendant has presented good cause for modifying the discovery and scheduling 28 order. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion (ECF No. 43) is HEREBY GRANTED. The 1 1 deadline for taking depositions is VACATED, and will be reset, if necessary, following a 2 ruling on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 13, 2015 /s/ 6 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?