Boyack et al v. Eleson
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING 10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiffs' 5 Motion for Remand be Granted signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 06/03/2011. REMANDING CASE to Tuolumne County Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DOUGLAS C. BOYACK, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00416-AWI-SKO
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS THAT
PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR
REMAND BE GRANTED
v.
14
ERIC RICHARD ELESON,
15
(Docs. 5, 10)
Defendant.
16
/
17
18
On April 22, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that
19
Plaintiffs’ motion to remand be granted. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all
20
parties appearing in the action and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within
21
seventeen (17) days after service of the order. On May 5, 2011, Defendant Eleson filed objections.
22
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a
23
de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the
24
Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1.
The April 22, 2011, Findings and Recommendations are adopted IN FULL;
27
2.
Plaintiffs’ request for judicial notice is GRANTED;
28
3.
Plaintiffs’ motion to remand this matter to the Tuolumne County Superior Court is
1
GRANTED;
2
4.
Defendant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED AS MOOT; and
3
5.
This action is to be administratively closed.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated:
0m8i78
June 3, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?