United States of America v. Briggs
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING Magistrate Judge's 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ENFORCING I.R.S. Summons, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/2/2011. Respondent, Mike Briggs, is ORDERED to appear at the I.R.S. offices at 2525 Capitol Street, Suite 205, Fresno, California 93721, before Revenue Officer Evan Moses, or his designated representative, 21 days after the issuance of this order. (Marrujo, C)
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Courthouse
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401
Fresno, California 93721
Telephone: (559) 497-4000
Facsimile: (559) 497-4099
6
Attorneys for Petitioner United States of America
1
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
MIKE BRIGGS,
)
)
Respondent.
)
____________________________________ )
Case No. 1:11-cv-00424-LJO-SKO
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND
ENFORCING I.R.S. SUMMONS
17
The United States here petitions for enforcement of an I.R.S. summons. The matter
18
was placed before United States Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto under 28 U.S.C. § 636,
19
et seq., and Local Rule 73-302.
20
The Verified Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons (“Petition”)
21
initiating this proceeding seeks to enforce an administrative summons, attached as Exhibit
22
A to the Petition. The summons aids Revenue Officer Evan Moses’ investigation of Mike
23
Briggs, as sole proprietor of Mike Briggs Properties, to obtain financial information to collect
24
assessed Employer’s Annual Federal Unemployment Tax (Form 940) for the tax years ending
25
December 31, 2007, December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2009; as well as to collect
26
Employer’s Federal Quarterly Tax (Form 941) for the tax periods ending December 31, 2006,
27
March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007, September 30, 2007, December 31, 2007, March 31, 2008,
28
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND ENFORCING I.R.S. SUMMONS
Page 1
1
June 30, 2008, September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008, March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009,
2
September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2009.
3
On March 23, 2011, Judge Oberto issued an Order to Show Cause, ordering the
4
respondent, Mike Briggs, to show cause why the I.R.S. summons issued to him on June 9,
5
2010, should not be enforced. The Petition, Points and Authorities, and Order to Show
6
Cause were personally served upon Respondent. Respondent did not file a written response.
7
The matter went before Judge Oberto for hearing on May 11, 2011. Yoshinori H. T.
8
Himel appeared for petitioner, and investigating Revenue Officer Evan Moses was present.
9
Attorney Stephen Mensel appeared on behalf of the respondent and expressed respondent’s
10
non-opposition
11
Recommendations on May 19, 2011, recommending enforcement.
12
objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations.
13
to
summons
enforcement.
Judge
Oberto
filed
Findings
and
Neither side filed
This Court reviewed the entire record de novo under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and
14
Local Rule 72-304.
15
recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis, that there is no
16
evidence of referral of this case by the Internal Revenue Service to the Department of Justice
17
for criminal prosecution in the record before the Court, and that the requested and unopposed
18
summons enforcement should be granted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
19
1. The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations Re: I.R.S. Summons
20
21
22
This Court is satisfied that the Magistrate Judge's findings and
Enforcement, filed May 19, 2011, are ADOPTED IN FULL.
2. The I.R.S. summons issued to respondent, Mike Briggs, as sole proprietor of Mike
Briggs Properties, is ENFORCED.
23
3. Respondent, Mike Briggs, is ORDERED to appear at the I.R.S. offices at 2525
24
Capitol Street, Suite 205, Fresno, California 93721, before Revenue Officer Evan Moses, or
25
his designated representative, 21 days after the issuance of this order, or at a later date to be
26
set in writing by Revenue Officer Moses, then and there to be sworn, to give testimony, and
27
to produce for examining and copying the books, checks, records, papers and other data
28
demanded by the summons, the examination to continue from day to day until completed.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND ENFORCING I.R.S. SUMMONS
Page 2
1
2
4.
The court retains jurisdiction for further proceedings should they become
necessary.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
66h44d
June 2, 2011
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND ENFORCING I.R.S. SUMMONS
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?