United States of America v. Briggs
Filing
9
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 1) The IRS summons issued to Respondent, Mike Briggs, be ENFORCED as follows: a) Respondent be ordered to appear at the IRS offices at 2525 Capitol Street, Suite 205, Fresno, California 93721, before Rev enue Officer Evan Moses, or his designated representative, twenty-one (21) days after the issuance of the order, or at a later date to be set in writing by Revenue Officer Moses; b) That upon his appearance, Respondent be sworn, to give testimony, an d to produce for examining and copying the books, checks, records, papers and other data demanded by the summons; and c) That the examination of Respondent shall continue from day to day until completed. 2) Jurisdiction be RETAINED to enforce its order by its contempt power. Matter referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due within ten (10) days after being served with these findings and recommendations; signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/18/2011. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
MIKE BRIGGS,
)
)
Respondent.
)
____________________________________ )
Case No. 1:11-cv-00424-LJO-SKO
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING I.R.S. SUMMONS
ENFORCEMENT
18
This matter came before the Court on May 11, 2011, pursuant to the Order to Show
19
Cause filed on March 23, 2011, which, with the verified petition and memorandum, was
20
personally served upon Respondent on March 25, 2011. Respondent did not file a written
21
opposition.
22
At the hearing, Yoshinori H. T. Himel appeared for Petitioner, and investigating
23
Revenue Officer Evan Moses was present. Stephen Mensel, Esquire, made a general
24
appearance on behalf of Respondent at the hearing.
25
The Verified Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Summons initiating
26
this proceeding seeks to enforce an administrative summons (Doc. 1) in aid of Revenue
27
Officer Moses’ investigation of Mike Briggs, as sole proprietor of Mike Briggs Properties,
28
to obtain financial information for the collection of assessed Employer’s Annual Federal
Page 1
1
Unemployment Tax (Form 940) for the tax years ending December 31, 2007, December 31,
2
2008, and December 31, 2009; and to collect Employer’s Federal Quarterly Tax (Form 941)
3
for the tax periods ending December 31, 2006, March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007, September
4
30, 2007, December 31, 2007, March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008, September 30, 2008,
5
December 31, 2008, March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009, September 30, 2009, and December 31,
6
2009.
7
Subject matter jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340 and 1345 and is found
8
to be proper. Sections 7402(b) and 7604(a) of the Internal Revenue Code authorize the
9
United States to bring the action. The Order to Show Cause shifted to Respondent the
10
burden of rebutting any of the four requirements of United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-
11
58 (1964).
12
13
Based on the uncontroverted verification of Revenue Officer Moses and the entire
record, the Court makes the following findings:
14
(1) The summons issued by Revenue Officer John J. Engelbert to Respondent, Mike
15
Briggs, sole proprietor of Mike Briggs Properties, on June 9, 2010, seeking testimony and
16
production of documents and records in Respondent's possession, was issued in good faith
17
and for a legitimate purpose under I.R.C. § 7602, that is, to obtain information for the
18
collection of assessed Employer’s Annual Federal Unemployment Tax (Form 940) for the
19
tax years ending December 31, 2007, December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2009; and to
20
collect Employer’s Federal Quarterly Tax (Form 941) for the tax periods ending December
21
31, 2006, March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007, September 30, 2007, December 31, 2007, March
22
31, 2008, June 30, 2008, September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008, March 31, 2009, June 30,
23
2009, September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2009.
24
(2) The information sought is relevant to that purpose.
25
(3) The information sought is not already in the possession of the Internal Revenue
26
Service.
27
28
Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
(4) The administrative steps required by the Internal Revenue Code have been
followed.
(5) There is no evidence of referral of this case by the Internal Revenue Service to the
Department of Justice for criminal prosecution.
(6) The verified petition and its exhibits made a prima facie showing of satisfaction
of the requirements of United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58 (1964).
7
(7) The burden shifted to Respondent, Mike Briggs, to rebut that prima facie showing.
8
(8) Respondent has presented no argument or evidence to rebut the prima facie
9
showing.
10
The Court therefore recommends that:
11
1.
The IRS summons issued to Respondent, Mike Briggs, be ENFORCED as
12
follows:
13
a.
Respondent be ordered to appear at the IRS offices at 2525 Capitol
14
Street, Suite 205, Fresno, California 93721, before Revenue Officer
15
Evan Moses, or his designated representative, twenty-one (21) days
16
after the issuance of the order, or at a later date to be set in writing by
17
Revenue Officer Moses;
b.
18
That upon his appearance, Respondent be sworn, to give testimony, and
19
to produce for examining and copying the books, checks, records,
20
papers and other data demanded by the summons; and
c.
21
That the examination of Respondent shall continue from day to day
until completed.
22
23
2.
Jurisdiction be RETAINED to enforce its order by its contempt power.
24
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
25
assigned to the case, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Rule 72-304 of the Local
26
Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Within ten
27
(10) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file
28
written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should
Page 3
1
be titled "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to
2
the objections shall be served and filed within ten (10) days after service of the objections.
3
The District Judge will then review these findings and recommendations pursuant to 28
4
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified
5
time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
6
(9th Cir. 1991).
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated:
ie14hj
May 18, 2011
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?