Berreondo v. Akanno et al

Filing 49

ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS And Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 12 , 45 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/18/2012. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11

MAXIMO BERREONDO,

12
13
14
15
16

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00432-LJO-DLB PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF (ECF No. 12)

v.
JONATHAN AKANNO, et al.,
Defendants.
/

17
18

Plaintiff Maximo Berreondo (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se

19

in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 9, 2011, Plaintiff filed a

20

motion for preliminary injunction. ECF No. 12. The matter was referred to a United States

21

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

22

On July 19, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which

23

was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the

24

Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 45. No party

25

filed a timely Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de

27

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings

28

and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 19, 2012, is adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, filed September 9, 2011, is denied.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

Dated:
b9ed48

August 18, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2