Bryant v. Gallagher et al
Filing
172
ORDER Setting Dispositive Motion Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/10/2014. Dispositive Motions filed by 2/10/2015. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEVIN DARNELL BRYANT,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
GALLAGHER, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:11-cv-00446-LJO-BAM PC
ORDER SETTING DISPOSITIVE MOTION
DEADLINE
Deadline: February 10, 2015
Plaintiff Kevin Darnell Bryant, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
19
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s first
20
amended complaint, filed on July 5, 2011, against Defendant Romero for deliberate indifference to
21
serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and against Defendants Gallagher and
22
Romero for conspiracy, retaliation in violation of the Eighth Amendment and failure to protect in
23
violation of the Eighth Amendment.
24
On December 19, 2012, the Court vacated the dispositive motion deadline in order to resolve
25
multiple pending motions to compel. (ECF No. 93.) As of the date of this order, all outstanding
26
discovery motions have been resolved. Accordingly, the Court finds it appropriate and necessary to
27
reset the dispositive motion deadline. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16. The deadline for filing all pre-trial
28
dispositive motions shall be February 10, 2015. A request for an extension of this deadline must be
1
1
filed on or before the expiration of the deadline. However, the parties are advised that an extension of
2
time will only be granted upon a clear showing of good cause.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
November 10, 2014
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?