Bryant v. Gallagher et al
Filing
294
ORDER VACATING 272 Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum Directing Transport of Inmate Kevin Darnel Bryant, CDCR# D-56620; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk's Office to Serve Order by Email on Salinas Valley State Prison signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/13/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
KEVIN DARNELL BRYANT,
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
v.
GALLAGHER, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:11-cv-00446-BAM (PC)
ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM DIRECTING
TRANSPORT OF INMATE KEVIN DARNELL
BRYANT, CDCR #D-56620
(ECF No. 272)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO
SERVE ORDER BY E-MAIL ON SALINAS
VALLEY STATE PRISON
17
18
On September 28, 2016, the Court issued a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum directing the
19
transport of Kevin Darnell Bryant, AKA Darnell Bryant, inmate, CDCR #D56620, for trial on October
20
17, 2016, as a witness on his own behalf in this matter. (ECF No. 272.) Now, for good cause shown,
21
the Court has vacated the October 17, 2016 trial date. Therefore, the transportation writ for Inmate
22
Bryant shall be vacated.
23
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1.
25
26
The writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum directing the production of Kevin Darnell
Bryant, AKA Darnell Bryant, inmate, CDCR #D56620, issued on September 28, 2016, is vacated;
2.
The Clerk’s Office shall serve a courtesy copy of this order by e-mail on the litigation
27
coordinator at Salinas Valley State Prison, and on the litigation coordinator of any other institution(s)
28
which require this information; and,
1
1
3.
The Clerk’s Office shall serve a courtesy copy of this order via mail on Inmate Bryant.
2
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
October 13, 2016
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?