Bryant v. Gallagher et al
Filing
296
ORDER VACATING 274 Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum Directing Transport of Inmate Rufus B. Levels, CDCR #F-62510; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk's Office to Serve Order by E-Mail on High Desert State Prison signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/13/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
KEVIN DARNELL BRYANT,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
v.
GALLAGHER, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:11-cv-00446-BAM (PC)
ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM DIRECTING
TRANSPORT OF INMATE RUFUS B. LEVELS,
CDCR #F-62510
(ECF No. 274)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO
SERVE ORDER BY E-MAIL ON HIGH
DESERT STATE PRISON
17
On September 28, 2016, the Court issued a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum directing the
18
19
transport of Rufus B. Levels, inmate, CDCR #F-62510, for trial on October 17, 2016, as a witness in
20
this matter. (ECF No. 274.) Now, for good cause shown, the Court has vacated the October 17, 2016
21
trial date. Therefore, the transportation writ for Inmate Levels shall be vacated.
22
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1.
24
The writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum directing the production of Rufus B. Levels,
inmate, CDCR #F-62510, issued on September 28, 2016, is vacated;
2.
25
The Clerk’s Office shall serve a courtesy copy of this order by e-mail on the litigation
26
coordinator at High Desert State Prison, and on the litigation coordinator of any other institution(s)
27
which require this information; and,
28
///
1
1
3.
The Clerk’s Office shall serve a courtesy copy of this order via mail on Inmate Levels.
2
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
October 13, 2016
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?