E. & J. Gallo Winery et al v. Toledo Engineering Co., Inc.
Filing
104
STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF E.&J. GALLO WINERY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ORDER THEREON signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on February 22, 2013. (Munoz, I)
1 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard,
Wayte & Carruth LLP
2 D. Greg Durbin, #81749
Timothy J. Buchanan, #100409
3 William H. Littlewood, #202877
5 River Park Place East
4 Fresno, California 93720-1501
Telephone:
(559) 433-1300
5 Facsimile:
(559) 433-2300
6 Cotchett, Pitre, & McCarthy LLP
Frank M. Pitre #100077
7 Steven N. Williams #175489
Gene W. Kim #279549
8 San Francisco Airport Office Center
840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
9 Burlingame, California 94010
Telephone:
(650) 697-6000
10 Facsimile:
(650) 697-0577
11 Attorneys for Plaintiff, E.&J. GALLO WINERY
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
15
16
E. & J. GALLO WINERY, a California
17 corporation,
Case No. 1:11-CV-00476-LGO-GSA
18
STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF E. & J.
GALLO WINERY’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ORDER
THEREON
19
Plaintiff,
v.
20 TOLEDO ENGINEERING CO., INC., an
Ohio corporation, and DOES I through XX,
21 inclusive,
22
Defendant.
[FRCP 56; Eastern District L.R., 260]
Hearing:
Date: March 21, 2013
Time: 8:30 AM
Courtroom:.4
23
24
Complaint Filed: February 14, 2011
Trial date:
July 9, 2013
25
26
Plaintiff E. & J. Gallo Winery (“Gallo”) and Defendant Toledo Engineering Co., Inc.
27 (“TECO”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby enter into the following
28 stipulation with respect to Gallo’s Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues:
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST
FRESNO, CA 93720-1501
STIPULATION RE GALLO WINERY’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ORDER THEREON
1
WHEREAS, Gallo has advised TECO that it intends to move for summary adjudication of
2 issues pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56 and Eastern District Local Rule 260,
3 seeking to adjudicate various affirmative defenses alleged by TECO in its Answer (Doc. # 7) to
4 Gallo’s Complaint, including, the first, second, fourth, eleventh, fourteenth, seventeenth and twentieth
5 affirmative defenses;
6
WHEREAS Gallo has further advised TECO that it intends to move affirmatively for summary
7 adjudication, finding that Gallo Glass Company has assigned to Gallo and Gallo holds all of Gallo
8 Glass Company’s rights, claims and causes of action, including those alleged in the complaint herein,
9 as set forth in E&J0034150;
10
WHEREAS, pursuant to the this Court’s Scheduling Order (Doc. #14, at pgs. 3-4), Gallo and
11 TECO, by and through their respective attorneys, met and conferred on February 19, 20 and 21, 2013,
12 regarding the issues raised by, and facts in support of, Gallo’s anticipated motion for summary
13 adjudication;
14
WHEREAS, as a result of the parties’ above-described meet and confer efforts, TECO and
15 Gallo agree that summary adjudication against TECO and in favor of Gallo is appropriate and should
16 be granted as to TECO’s second and twentieth affirmative defenses alleged in TECO’s Answer, and
17 that Gallo Glass Company has assigned to Gallo and Gallo holds all of Gallo Glass Company’s rights,
18 claims and causes of action, including those alleged in the complaint herein, as set forth in
19 E&J0034150;
20
WHEREAS, as a result of the parties’ above-described meet and confer efforts, TECO and
21 Gallo further agree that an order should be entered, adjudicating such affirmative defenses and issue
22 against TECO and in favor of Gallo without the necessity of the parties litigating a motion thereon:
23
Based on the forgoing, Gallo and TECO stipulate and agree to an order from this Court on
24 Gallo a motion for summary adjudication relating to the following without the need of litigating a
25 motion thereon, that:
26
1.
GRANTS summary adjudication against TECO on TECO’s second affirmative
27 defense;
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST
FRESNO, CA 93720-1501
2.
GRANTS summary adjudication against TECO on TECO’s twentieth affirmative
2
STIPULATION RE GALLO WINERY’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ORDER THEREON
1 defense; and
2
3.
GRANTS summary adjudication, finding that Gallo Glass Company has assigned to
3 Gallo and Gallo holds all of Gallo Glass Company’s rights, claims and causes of action, including
4 those alleged in the complaint herein, as set forth in E&J0034150.
5
SO STIPULATED:
6 Dated: February 21, 2013
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
7
8
/s/ D. Greg Durbin
D. Greg Durbin
Timothy J. Buchanan
William H. Littlewood
Attorneys for Plaintiff, E.&J. GALLO WINERY
By:
9
10
11
12
13 Dated: February 21, 2013
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
14
15
By:
16
17
18
/s/ Melissa M. Whitehead
David S. Worthington
Melissa M. Whitehead
Talia L. Delanoy
Attorneys for Defendant TOLEDO
ENGINEERING CO., INC
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST
FRESNO, CA 93720-1501
3
STIPULATION RE GALLO WINERY’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ORDER THEREON
1
2
ORDER
Upon the stipulation of Plaintiff E. & J. Gallo Winery (“Gallo”) and Defendant Toledo
3 Engineering Co., Inc. (“TECO”), and good cause appearing therefore, this Court HEREBY issues the
4 following ORDER, without the necessity of the parties litigating a motion for summary adjudication
5 thereon, that:
6
GRANTS summary adjudication against TECO on TECO’s second affirmative
1.
7 defense;
8
GRANTS summary adjudication against TECO on TECO’s twentieth affirmative
2.
9 defense; and
10
3.
GRANTS summary adjudication, finding that Gallo Glass Company has assigned to
11 Gallo and Gallo holds all of Gallo Glass Company’s rights, claims and causes of action, including
12 those alleged in the complaint herein, as set forth in E&J0034150.
13
14
15 IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
February 22, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
66h44d
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW ,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST
FRESNO, CA 93720-1501
4
STIPULATION RE GALLO WINERY’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ORDER THEREON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?