E. & J. Gallo Winery et al v. Toledo Engineering Co., Inc.

Filing 104

STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF E.&J. GALLO WINERY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ORDER THEREON signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on February 22, 2013. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP 2 D. Greg Durbin, #81749 Timothy J. Buchanan, #100409 3 William H. Littlewood, #202877 5 River Park Place East 4 Fresno, California 93720-1501 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 5 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 6 Cotchett, Pitre, & McCarthy LLP Frank M. Pitre #100077 7 Steven N. Williams #175489 Gene W. Kim #279549 8 San Francisco Airport Office Center 840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 9 Burlingame, California 94010 Telephone: (650) 697-6000 10 Facsimile: (650) 697-0577 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff, E.&J. GALLO WINERY 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 15 16 E. & J. GALLO WINERY, a California 17 corporation, Case No. 1:11-CV-00476-LGO-GSA 18 STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF E. & J. GALLO WINERY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ORDER THEREON 19 Plaintiff, v. 20 TOLEDO ENGINEERING CO., INC., an Ohio corporation, and DOES I through XX, 21 inclusive, 22 Defendant. [FRCP 56; Eastern District L.R., 260] Hearing: Date: March 21, 2013 Time: 8:30 AM Courtroom:.4 23 24 Complaint Filed: February 14, 2011 Trial date: July 9, 2013 25 26 Plaintiff E. & J. Gallo Winery (“Gallo”) and Defendant Toledo Engineering Co., Inc. 27 (“TECO”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby enter into the following 28 stipulation with respect to Gallo’s Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues: MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 STIPULATION RE GALLO WINERY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ORDER THEREON 1 WHEREAS, Gallo has advised TECO that it intends to move for summary adjudication of 2 issues pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56 and Eastern District Local Rule 260, 3 seeking to adjudicate various affirmative defenses alleged by TECO in its Answer (Doc. # 7) to 4 Gallo’s Complaint, including, the first, second, fourth, eleventh, fourteenth, seventeenth and twentieth 5 affirmative defenses; 6 WHEREAS Gallo has further advised TECO that it intends to move affirmatively for summary 7 adjudication, finding that Gallo Glass Company has assigned to Gallo and Gallo holds all of Gallo 8 Glass Company’s rights, claims and causes of action, including those alleged in the complaint herein, 9 as set forth in E&J0034150; 10 WHEREAS, pursuant to the this Court’s Scheduling Order (Doc. #14, at pgs. 3-4), Gallo and 11 TECO, by and through their respective attorneys, met and conferred on February 19, 20 and 21, 2013, 12 regarding the issues raised by, and facts in support of, Gallo’s anticipated motion for summary 13 adjudication; 14 WHEREAS, as a result of the parties’ above-described meet and confer efforts, TECO and 15 Gallo agree that summary adjudication against TECO and in favor of Gallo is appropriate and should 16 be granted as to TECO’s second and twentieth affirmative defenses alleged in TECO’s Answer, and 17 that Gallo Glass Company has assigned to Gallo and Gallo holds all of Gallo Glass Company’s rights, 18 claims and causes of action, including those alleged in the complaint herein, as set forth in 19 E&J0034150; 20 WHEREAS, as a result of the parties’ above-described meet and confer efforts, TECO and 21 Gallo further agree that an order should be entered, adjudicating such affirmative defenses and issue 22 against TECO and in favor of Gallo without the necessity of the parties litigating a motion thereon: 23 Based on the forgoing, Gallo and TECO stipulate and agree to an order from this Court on 24 Gallo a motion for summary adjudication relating to the following without the need of litigating a 25 motion thereon, that: 26 1. GRANTS summary adjudication against TECO on TECO’s second affirmative 27 defense; 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 2. GRANTS summary adjudication against TECO on TECO’s twentieth affirmative 2 STIPULATION RE GALLO WINERY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ORDER THEREON 1 defense; and 2 3. GRANTS summary adjudication, finding that Gallo Glass Company has assigned to 3 Gallo and Gallo holds all of Gallo Glass Company’s rights, claims and causes of action, including 4 those alleged in the complaint herein, as set forth in E&J0034150. 5 SO STIPULATED: 6 Dated: February 21, 2013 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 7 8 /s/ D. Greg Durbin D. Greg Durbin Timothy J. Buchanan William H. Littlewood Attorneys for Plaintiff, E.&J. GALLO WINERY By: 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: February 21, 2013 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 14 15 By: 16 17 18 /s/ Melissa M. Whitehead David S. Worthington Melissa M. Whitehead Talia L. Delanoy Attorneys for Defendant TOLEDO ENGINEERING CO., INC 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 3 STIPULATION RE GALLO WINERY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ORDER THEREON 1 2 ORDER Upon the stipulation of Plaintiff E. & J. Gallo Winery (“Gallo”) and Defendant Toledo 3 Engineering Co., Inc. (“TECO”), and good cause appearing therefore, this Court HEREBY issues the 4 following ORDER, without the necessity of the parties litigating a motion for summary adjudication 5 thereon, that: 6 GRANTS summary adjudication against TECO on TECO’s second affirmative 1. 7 defense; 8 GRANTS summary adjudication against TECO on TECO’s twentieth affirmative 2. 9 defense; and 10 3. GRANTS summary adjudication, finding that Gallo Glass Company has assigned to 11 Gallo and Gallo holds all of Gallo Glass Company’s rights, claims and causes of action, including 12 those alleged in the complaint herein, as set forth in E&J0034150. 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 18 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill February 22, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 66h44d 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 RIVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 4 STIPULATION RE GALLO WINERY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?