E. & J. Gallo Winery et al v. Toledo Engineering Co., Inc.

Filing 126

ORDER denying 92 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues; granting in part and denying in part 95 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 112 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim subject to conditions stated in court, signed by District Judge Sam E. Haddon on 4/22/2013. (Gaumnitz, R)

I

2
3

4

5

IN mE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

E & J GALLO WINERY,

9

CASE NO. CV F 1l-0476-SEH-GSA

Plaintiff,
ORDER

10
II

vs,
TOLEDO ENGINEERING CO., INC.,

12

Defendant.

13
14
Upon the record made in open court on April 22, 2013,

15
ORDERED:

16

L

Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Adjudication of Issues! is DENIED.

2,

Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment2 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part

17
18

as stated on the record.
19
3.
20
21

22

Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Counterclaiml is GRANTED subject to the

conditions stated in open co~
DATED this ~ day of April, 2013.

~f~~--

23

24

United States District Judge

25
26

!

Document No, 92,

27

2 Document No,

28

3

\0 1.

Document No, 112,

1